{"id":97404,"date":"2001-10-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2001-10-31T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/2001\/10\/31\/part-3-new-community-participants\/"},"modified":"2024-04-14T04:14:29","modified_gmt":"2024-04-14T09:14:29","slug":"part-3-new-community-participants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/part-3-new-community-participants\/","title":{"rendered":"Part 3: New Community Participants"},"content":{"rendered":"

Net Joiners: The people who find groups on the Internet, then become members<\/h3>\n\n

In addition to fostering chatter, the Net is drawing people to groups they had not previously encountered. In part of our survey we asked respondents about the online group they most frequently contacted via the Internet. We enquired whether they belonged to this group before they started using the Internet. More than half of Cyber Groupies (56%) joined the group after having begun communicating with it over the Internet. For Local Groupies, 20% joined the group after they begun communicating with it on the Internet. We call the people who have joined a group after being in contact via the Internet \u201cNet Joiners.\u201d The people who already belong to a group and who then begin to use the Internet to stay in touch with group activities are \u201cLong-timers.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

\"Cyber<\/figure>\n<\/p>\n\n

Net Joiners generally have less Internet experience than Long-timers. Net Joiners are also more demographically diverse than Long-time group members. Notably, the joiners as a group are younger than the overall Internet population. Although Net Joiners tend to report lower levels of frequent participation in online groups than Long-timers do, there does not appear to be pervasive lurking among either Net Joiners or Long-timers.\u00a0 Many people, when thinking about the group with which they are most involved, report they are active participants in online discussions.<\/p>\n\n

Joiners of online groups, whether they are cyber groups or local groups, have different membership patterns.\u00a0 Net Joiners are drawn principally to hobbyist groups, whereas Long-timers are most involved with trade or professional associations.\u00a0 For Local Groupies, the differences are more striking.\u00a0 While most Long-time members of local groups are most engaged with religious groups, Net Joiners are evenly split among religious groups and local youth groups. Moreover, they are interested in charitable groups, neighborhood associations, and local sports leagues.\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

On average, Cyber Groupies are most likely to say that a trade or professional group is the online group with which they most closely stay in touch (21% say this), followed closely by hobby groups (17%).\u00a0 In contrast, Net Joiners of online groups are most involved with a\u00a0group having to do with a hobby. <\/p>\n\n

Net Joiners are less involved with their online group than Long-time members, if involvement is measured by email traffic with the group, new acquaintances made, and perceptions about overall engagement with the group.\u00a0 About half of all Net Joiners (49%) say they use email to communicate with an online group, well below the three-quarters (78%) of Long-timers who use the Internet to keep in touch with it.\u00a0 However, when measured by frequency of email contact, Net Joiners are about as likely as the Long-time members to send or receive an email from the group at least several times a week (41% for Net Joiners to 45% for Long-timers).\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

\"A<\/figure>\n<\/p>\n\n

Those who join online groups seem a bit more interested in using the Internet to monitor group news than their more veteran counterparts.\u00a0 Fully 79% of Net Joiners use the Internet to get general membership information and news about the group compared with 74% of Long-timers. Although about the same share of Net Joiners and veteran members use email to discuss issues with group members (67% of Net Joiners and 70% of veteran members), pre-Internet members are more likely to use email to create or maintain personal relationships with group members than Net Joiners (by a 53% to 44% margin).<\/p>\n\n

Demographically, Net Joiners of cyber groups are more likely than Long-timers to be female, young, non-white, come from households with modest incomes, and relatively new to the Internet. Net Joiners are far less likely to have a college education than Long-timers and twice as likely to be in a household making less than $30,000 per year.\u00a0 Net Joiners are also about twice as likely as Long-Timers to be Hispanic or African-American. Another notable difference comes in Internet experience.\u00a0 These figures suggest that not only are cyber groups a magnet for Internet users, they are especially attractive to novice Internet users.\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

Those who take their communities online<\/h3>\n\n

Internet users who have joined a local group after encountering it online are most likely to be involved with a religious group (a local church, synagogue, or mosque) or a local youth group.\u00a0 About 1 in 7 (15%) Net Joiners keep most in touch with a local religious group and 14% are most engaged with a local youth group.\u00a0 Eleven percent of Net Joiners are most involved with a local social club or charitable organization, 10% with a sports league, and 10% with a neighborhood group or community organization. <\/p>\n\n

The story is somewhat different for people who already belonged to a local group at the time they started communicating with it through the Internet.\u00a0 By far, the local church, synagogue, temple, or mosque is the type of group with which these users say they are most involved.\u00a0 Fully one-third (34%) says a religious organization is the main local group they communicate with over the Internet, far ahead of the 10% that report a community group or neighborhood association as their main contact group.\u00a0 Local sports leagues and local charitable or social clubs come in next.<\/p>\n\n

No matter when they joined local groups \u2013 before using the Internet or after they got connected to the Net \u2013 there is no significant difference in the online behavior of those who use the Internet to interact with local groups. Their use of email with such groups and the frequency of their emailing are virtually the same whether they are Net Joiners of local groups or Long-timers with those groups. <\/p>\n\n

\"Local<\/figure>\n<\/p>\n\n

Those who join local groups often report that their initial contact blossoms into new contacts and friendships. We asked Net Joiners if communicating with their group through the Internet has led them to meeting new people in their community and 57% said it had. About 30% of Long-timers said \u201cyes\u201d to this.\u00a0 This difference is not too surprising, since people who were members of the group prior to using the Internet to communicate with it already had ties to other group members.\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

This reasoning also explains the gap between Net Joiners and Long-timers when asked whether using the Internet to communicate with the group has increased their involvement in the community.\u00a0 Fully 57% of Net Joiners said that it had, while 34% of Long-timers said the Internet has increased their involvement in their community.\u00a0 It is notable nonetheless that even for people who had some connection to a local group prior to using the Internet as a means to keep up with it, one-third say the Internet has helped them meet new people and increase their involvement with their community.<\/p>\n\n

\"Who<\/figure>\n<\/p>\n\n

Demographically, there are wide differences in racial composition when comparing Net Joiners and Long-timers who use the Internet to stay connected with a local group.\u00a0 Fully 85% of Long-timers are white compared with 68% of Net Joiners who are white.\u00a0 Only 4% of Long-timers are Hispanic, while 11% of Net Joiners are Hispanic.\u00a0 Among African-Americans, 10% of Net Joiners are black compared to 5% of Long-timers.\u00a0 The differences persist for income and education.\u00a0 Finally, Net Joiners are urban dwellers; 41% live in urban areas, compared to 31% of all Internet users.<\/p>\n\n

Building new ties; strengthening existing ones<\/h3>\n\n

For millions, use of the Internet cuts two ways in their social lives: It helps them find others who share their passions or lifestyles or professional interests. It also helps them feel more connected to groups or people they already know. <\/p>\n\n

The table below summarizes Internet users\u2019 perspectives on how the Internet allows them to connect to different groups or people.\u00a0 The Internet\u2019s strongest bridges are relatively short ones. Online Americans most often say that the Internet has helped them connect to groups with which they are already involved or people or groups with common interests.\u00a0 Still, between one-quarter and one-third of Cyber Groupies say that the Net has helped them connect with people of different ages, ethnic backgrounds, or economic backgrounds.\u00a0 One bridge that the Internet does not build, at least to a large extent, is to local community groups.\u00a0 Of the 26% of Cyber Groupies who said it has helped connect them to nearby groups, only 6% says it has helped them \u201ca lot\u201d in getting them in touch with locally-based groups.<\/p>\n\n

Cyber Groupies who are active in their online group are more likely to use the Net to connect with new people or groups.\u00a0 These users\u2014defined as those who are members of a local and cyber group and<\/i> who exchange emails with the group\u2014are substantially more likely than other Internet users to report that the Internet has deepened their ties to groups to which they already belong or to local community groups. They enjoy a kind of \u201cparticipatory premium.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

The effect is also significant when survey respondents are asked how effective the Internet is in helping them find people who share their interests or beliefs. Those active in online communities are more likely than other Internet users to say their online activities help them connect with people of different backgrounds. Given that the pool of active online community members is among the Internet elite (the technology\u2019s early adopters who tend to be white, wealthy, and educated) this last finding is understandable.\u00a0 These users are accustomed to talking to those people and groups with whom they have conversed since they came to the Internet. On average, these people are not too different from each other.<\/p>\n\n

\"How<\/figure>\n<\/p>\n\n

As Internet adoption continues, it might be the case that new users are more likely to connect with people of different backgrounds than their predecessors in large part because the Internet population continues to diversify. Although difficult to predict, there is some evidence that this broadening of users\u2019 social universes might increase as the Internet population grows. <\/p>\n\n

The behavior of Local Groupies who joined an online community after making initial Internet contact illustrates this hopeful scenario. They are fairly diverse set of Internet veterans, with 11% Hispanics, 10% African-Americans, and 68% whites.\u00a0 This subset of Local Groupies is much more likely than active online community members in general to connect with people of different backgrounds.\u00a0 When asked whether the Internet has helped them connect with people from different generations, 53% said it had \u201ca lot\u201d or \u201csome\u201d; 41% said it had helped them connect with people from different racial or ethnic backgrounds; and 46% said the Internet had helped them connect with people from different economic backgrounds.\u00a0 And more than half (54%) said the Internet helped them connect to groups in their local community.\u00a0 In each case, these numbers represent about a 10-point increase over the average for active online community members.\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

The Internet is also a bridge builder for younger members of online communities.\u00a0 Many in the 18-to-24 age bracket say the Internet helps them reach out to people of different ages, economic backgrounds, and ethnicity.\u00a0 Nearly half (47%) of online community members between the ages of 18 and 24 say the Internet helps \u201ca lot\u201d or \u201csome\u201d to connect them to people in different generations, 42% say it has helped make connections with people in different ethnic groups, and 36% say it has helped them reach out to people from different economic backgrounds.\u00a0 And 29% say it has helped them connect to groups in their local community.\u00a0 For the young who are quite active in online communities (i.e., those who email their groups), the results are more striking.\u00a0 Fully 60% say the Internet has helped connect them to people of different generations, 54% say that about ethnic groups, and 44% say it has helped them connect to local community groups.<\/p>\n\n

In sum, online communities are enabling Internet users to build bridges to other groups and people, while at the same time deepening ties to groups and ideas with which people are already involved.\u00a0 As the Internet draws people to online groups, it is notable that these people (i.e., Net Joiners among Local Groupies) are ethnically more diverse than other Internet users.\u00a0 As the Internet disseminates more broadly throughout the population, there are signs that online groups may facilitate new connections across ethnic, economic, and generational categories.\u00a0 It is also worth underscoring that young people seem especially interested in taking advantage of the Internet\u2019s bridge building potential in online groups.\u00a0 As noted at the outset, there is pervasive worry that young people shy away from group activity and civic engagement.\u00a0 With the online groups drawing young people into groups involved with their local community, this survey suggests that the Internet may develop into an important new avenue for civic engagement among young people.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Net Joiners: The people who find groups on the Internet, then become members In addition to fostering chatter, the Net is drawing people to groups they had not previously encountered. In part of our survey we asked respondents about the online group they most frequently contacted via the Internet. We enquired whether they belonged to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sub_headline":"","sub_title":"","_crdt_document":"","_prc_public_revisions":[],"_ppp_expiration_hours":0,"_ppp_enabled":false,"ai_generated_summary":"","relatedPosts":[],"reportMaterials":[],"multiSectionReport":[],"package_parts__enabled":false,"package_parts":[],"_prc_fork_parent":0,"_prc_fork_status":"","_prc_active_fork":0,"datacite_doi":"","datacite_doi_citation":"","_prc_seo_qr_attachment_id":0,"spoken_article_player_enabled":true,"bylines":[],"acknowledgements":[],"displayBylines":true,"footnotes":"","prc_watchers":[]},"categories":[],"tags":[],"bylines":[],"collection":[],"datasets":[],"level_of_effort":[],"primary_audience":[],"information_type":[],"_post_visibility":[],"formats":[458],"_fund_pool":[],"languages":[],"regions-countries":[],"research-teams":[526],"workflow-status":[],"class_list":["post-97404","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","formats-report","research-teams-internet"],"label":false,"post_parent":97507,"word_count":2051,"canonical_url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/part-3-new-community-participants\/","art_direction":false,"_embeds":[],"watchers":[],"table_of_contents":[{"id":97507,"title":"Online Communities","slug":"online-communities","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/online-communities\/","is_active":false},{"id":97514,"title":"Part 1: Background","slug":"part-1-background-2","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/part-1-background-2\/","is_active":false},{"id":97400,"title":"Part 2: The Internet, Communities, and the Virtual \u201cThird Place\u201d","slug":"part-2-the-internet-communities-and-the-virtual-third-place","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/part-2-the-internet-communities-and-the-virtual-third-place\/","is_active":false},{"id":97404,"title":"Part 3: New Community Participants","slug":"part-3-new-community-participants","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/part-3-new-community-participants\/","is_active":true},{"id":97411,"title":"Part 4: The Differences Among Online Group Members","slug":"part-4-the-differences-among-online-group-members","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/part-4-the-differences-among-online-group-members\/","is_active":false},{"id":97418,"title":"Part 5: The Internet and the Local Scene","slug":"part-5-the-internet-and-the-local-scene","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/part-5-the-internet-and-the-local-scene\/","is_active":false},{"id":97425,"title":"Methodology","slug":"methodology-157-2","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/methodology-157-2\/","is_active":false}],"report_materials":"","report_pagination":{"current_post":{"id":97404,"title":"Part 3: New Community Participants","slug":"part-3-new-community-participants","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/part-3-new-community-participants\/","is_active":true,"page_num":4},"next_post":{"id":97411,"title":"Part 4: The Differences Among Online Group Members","slug":"part-4-the-differences-among-online-group-members","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/part-4-the-differences-among-online-group-members\/","is_active":false,"page_num":5},"previous_post":{"id":97400,"title":"Part 2: The Internet, Communities, and the Virtual \u201cThird Place\u201d","slug":"part-2-the-internet-communities-and-the-virtual-third-place","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/part-2-the-internet-communities-and-the-virtual-third-place\/","is_active":false,"page_num":3},"pagination_items":[{"id":97507,"title":"Online Communities","slug":"online-communities","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/online-communities\/","is_active":false,"page_num":1},{"id":97514,"title":"Part 1: Background","slug":"part-1-background-2","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/part-1-background-2\/","is_active":false,"page_num":2},{"id":97400,"title":"Part 2: The Internet, Communities, and the Virtual \u201cThird Place\u201d","slug":"part-2-the-internet-communities-and-the-virtual-third-place","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/part-2-the-internet-communities-and-the-virtual-third-place\/","is_active":false,"page_num":3},{"id":97404,"title":"Part 3: New Community Participants","slug":"part-3-new-community-participants","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/part-3-new-community-participants\/","is_active":true,"page_num":4},{"id":97411,"title":"Part 4: The Differences Among Online Group Members","slug":"part-4-the-differences-among-online-group-members","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/part-4-the-differences-among-online-group-members\/","is_active":false,"page_num":5},{"id":97418,"title":"Part 5: The Internet and the Local Scene","slug":"part-5-the-internet-and-the-local-scene","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/part-5-the-internet-and-the-local-scene\/","is_active":false,"page_num":6},{"id":97425,"title":"Methodology","slug":"methodology-157-2","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2001\/10\/31\/methodology-157-2\/","is_active":false,"page_num":7}]},"parent_info":{"parent_title":"Online Communities","parent_id":97507},"materialsOrdered":[],"chaptersOrdered":[],"partsOrdered":[],"partsEnabled":false,"datacite_doi":"","prc_seo_data":{"title":"Part 3: New Community Participants","description":"Net Joiners: The people who find groups on the Internet, then become members In addition to fostering chatter, the Net is drawing people to groups they had not previously encountered.…","og_title":"Part 3: New Community Participants","og_description":"","schema_type":"Article","noindex":false,"canonical_url":"","primary_terms":[],"custom_schema":[],"og_image":0,"indexnow_submitted_at":null,"gsc_index_status":null},"prepublish_checks":{"prc-image-alt-text":{"status":"complete","message":"No image blocks in content.","data":null},"prc-about-this-research":{"status":"incomplete","message":"Add an \"About this research\" details block.","data":null},"prc-paragraph-count":{"status":"complete","message":"Found 21 paragraphs.","data":{"count":21}},"prc-internal-link":{"status":"incomplete","message":"Add at least one internal link.","data":{"count":0}}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"relatedPostsOrdered":[],"bylinesOrdered":[],"acknowledgementsOrdered":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97404","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=97404"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97404\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":134112,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97404\/revisions\/134112"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=97404"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=97404"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=97404"},{"taxonomy":"bylines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/bylines?post=97404"},{"taxonomy":"collection","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collection?post=97404"},{"taxonomy":"datasets","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/datasets?post=97404"},{"taxonomy":"level_of_effort","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/level_of_effort?post=97404"},{"taxonomy":"primary_audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/primary_audience?post=97404"},{"taxonomy":"information_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/information_type?post=97404"},{"taxonomy":"_post_visibility","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_post_visibility?post=97404"},{"taxonomy":"formats","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/formats?post=97404"},{"taxonomy":"_fund_pool","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_fund_pool?post=97404"},{"taxonomy":"languages","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/languages?post=97404"},{"taxonomy":"regions-countries","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/regions-countries?post=97404"},{"taxonomy":"research-teams","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/research-teams?post=97404"},{"taxonomy":"workflow-status","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/workflow-status?post=97404"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}