{"id":92070,"date":"2007-08-20T00:00:01","date_gmt":"2007-08-20T05:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/2007\/08\/20\/the-2008-campaign-an-escalating-war\/"},"modified":"2024-04-14T04:12:43","modified_gmt":"2024-04-14T09:12:43","slug":"the-2008-campaign-an-escalating-war","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/the-2008-campaign-an-escalating-war\/","title":{"rendered":"The 2008 Campaign: An Escalating War"},"content":{"rendered":"

In the second quarter of 2007, the presidential campaign took over center stage. It was the top storyline overall, accounting for 9% of the newshole and edging out any one of the three Iraq story threads. (The Iraq war coverage<\/a> combined amassed 15% of the newshole this quarter, but campaign coverage supplanted each of the three specific Iraq-related storylines, including the biggest\u2014the debate over U.S. policy.) <\/p>\n\n

Top News Stories for the Second Quarter of 2007
<\/strong>Apr. 1, \u201807 \u2013 June 29, \u201807 <\/p>\n\n

\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Rank<\/strong> <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Top Stories<\/strong><\/td>\nPercent of Newshole<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

1 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2008 Campaign <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

8.5% <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

2 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Events in Iraq*<\/strong><\/td>\n\n

6.7 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

3 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Iraq Policy Debate*<\/strong><\/td>\n\n

6.6 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

4 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Immigration <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5.7 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

5 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

VA Tech Shootings <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.9 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

6 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Don Imus <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.4 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

7 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Iran <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.1 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

8 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Fired Attorneys <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.9 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

9 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Iraq Homefront*<\/strong><\/td>\n\n

1.5 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

10 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Palestinian Conflict <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.4 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Iraq War Total (* a sum of the three starred stories)<\/strong> <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

14.8<\/strong> <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n\n

Cable news was the most focused on the campaign. That sector of the media devoted 12% of the newshole studied<\/a> in PEJ\u2019s index to the campaign, up a quarter from 9% in the first three months of the year. And among the three competing channels there, MSNBC far out-paced the others. It devoted fully 21% of its airtime on the campaign, more than twice that of either CNN (9%) or Fox News (10%). <\/p>\n\n

Election coverage also topped the list of stories in radio news (10% of its newshole) and newspapers (8%). <\/p>\n\n

The election was a smaller story among the online news sites studied. Here it ranked third (5% of the newshole), behind events in Iraq and debate over the U.S. policy there.1<\/a><\/sup> <\/p>\n\n

The only other genre in which campaign news did not top the list was network TV, but here it ranked second and was a just a half a percentage point shy of the top story, events in Iraq. After rounding, both the campaign and events in Iraq accounted for roughly 7% of the newshole. It should be noted, though, that morning news shows are more focused on the campaign so far this year than the evening newscasts. <\/p>\n\n

2008 Presidential Campaign Coverage
<\/strong>Apr. 1, \u201807 \u2013 June 29, \u201807, by Medium <\/p>\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/p>\n\n

\n<\/p>\n\n

Coverage evens out (sort of) among Democrats and Republicans <\/h3>\n\n

Another change in campaign coverage in the second quarter of the year is that as reporting increased, the Democrats\u2019 big lead in exposure diminished. Earlier in the year, Democrats outscored Republicans by more than 2-to-1 (61% versus 24%). In the second quarter, however, the two parties ended up with nearly equal amounts of the newshole: 42% Democrats and 41% Republicans. Another 11% of the coverage considered both parties together. <\/p>\n\n

2008 Presidential Campaign Coverage<\/strong>
by Political Party <\/p>\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/p>\n\n

The second quarter also brought the addition of a potential 3rd party candidate\u2014New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who switched his party affiliation to independent on June 19.2<\/a><\/sup> The press was fascinated. For June, coverage of Bloomberg alone accounted for 11% of all the election coverage in the PEJ News Index. For the quarter, coverage of Bloomberg made up 4% of the campaign coverage. <\/p>\n\n

Despite the increased attention for the GOP, a look inside the numbers suggests that month in and month out, the media remain more interested in the seven competing Democratic candidates. They still dominated the coverage in both April (54% versus 28% Republicans) and June (43% versus 34% Republicans). It was only the month of May that the Republicans ran away with the headlines, outscoring Democrats by nearly 2-to-1. That month, Republicans captured 57% of the newshole, versus 30% for their Democratic counterparts and 12% that considered both parties together <\/p>\n\n

2008 Presidential Campaign Coverage<\/strong>
Dec. 31, \u201806 \u2013 June 29, \u201807, by Political Party <\/p>\n\n

\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/p>\n\n

The Republican dominance in May suggests also the degree to which the campaign coverage is driven by planned events\u2014often events organized by the media themselves\u2014rather than by anything the candidates have said about their plans for the country or certain voting groups. <\/p>\n\n

The month Republicans finally outstripped Democrats in coverage was one in which there were two different Republican debates (and none on the Democratic side) as well as public statements by two potential new candidates\u2014Fred Thompson and Newt Gingrich (neither of which have as yet announced). <\/p>\n\n

In June, the pendulum quickly swung back to the Democrats and left them clearly in the lead for the first half of 2007. For the full six-months, Democrats grabbed 51% of the newshole in the Index, compared with 33% for Republican. Another 12% of the coverage was about both parties. <\/p>\n\n

Campaign coverage across media
<\/h3>\n\n

Does the amount of press coverage devoted to one party or another differ by media sector, or by news outlet? <\/p>\n\n

There are some slight differences depending on which sector or type of media one consumes. Democratic candidates got more coverage in the second quarter in all sectors except for newspapers and cable. In those two sectors where Democrats did not get the majority of the newshole, the Republican edge was so slight that over the course of the entire six month period, the Democrats still come out on top. <\/p>\n\n

Campaign Coverage by Media Sector
<\/strong>Apr. 1, \u201807 \u2013 June 29, \u201807 <\/p>\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

\u00a0 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Democrats<\/strong><\/td>\nRepublicans<\/strong><\/td>\nBoth Parties<\/strong><\/td>\nThird Parties<\/strong><\/td>\nOther<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Newspaper<\/strong><\/td>\n\n

36% <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

44% <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

15% <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3% <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1% <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Online<\/strong><\/td>\n\n

49 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

39 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Network TV<\/strong><\/td>\n\n

45 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

38 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

11 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Cable TV<\/strong><\/td>\n\n

39 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

43 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

12 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Radio<\/strong><\/td>\n\n

44 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

38 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

10 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n\n

And what about the three cable news channels, where audience demographics\u2014particularly along political lines\u2014differ more than outlets in other genres? Data from the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press suggest that Fox News\u2019 audience tilts Republican and conservative, while CNN\u2019s and now MSNBC\u2019s tilts Democratic and liberal.3<\/a><\/sup> In covering the campaign, did the networks slot stories accordingly, giving more airtime to the party preferences of their core audiences? <\/p>\n\n

Overall the three cable channels in the second quarter and year to date are strikingly similar in their party breakdowns. From April 1 though June 29, each devoted 37-40% of the air-time studied to Democrats and 41-44% to Republicans (the percentages spent on dual-party stories varied a bit more). <\/p>\n\n

Differences do emerge, however, when one looks inside each network at party-line focus of specific programs\u2014and program hosts. The differences were first noted for the second quarter. We then looked across all six months of the year and found that the differences remain\u2014and in some cases are even greater.4<\/a><\/sup> <\/p>\n\n

On Fox, for the first six months of the year, Brit Hume\u2019s 6 pm program (EST) for the days captured was fairly mixed (40% of the campaign coverage about GOP candidates versus 33% about Democrats). His program also spent the greatest amount of story-time considering candidates from both parties (20%). <\/p>\n\n

The next hour, though, Shepard Smith\u2019s program was heavily focused on the Democrats: Nearly seven times as much airtime for Democrats as Republicans (73% versus 10%). (Smith\u2019s program also devoted the greatest percent of airtime of any cable program studied, 9%, to 3rd party candidates like Mayor Bloomberg.) <\/p>\n\n

At the 8 p.m. hour, The O\u2019Reilly Factor stuck with them Democrats, 64% versus 27%. But at 9 pm, Hannity & Colmes moved the dial back toward the middle with Democrats outpacing Republicans over the first six months of 2007 (48% versus 34%). <\/p>\n\n

2008 Presidential Campaign Coverage
<\/strong>Fox News, Dec. 31, \u201806 \u2013 June 29, \u201807 <\/p>\n\n

\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/p>\n\n

Note: \u201cOther\u201d category includes coverage of third party, both parties and other non-candidate stories<\/em> <\/p>\n\n

On CNN, the picture was also split. The early evening program hosted by Lou Dobbs was evenly divided, 43% Democrats versus 43% Republicans and 12% a mix of both. An hour later, on Wolf Blitzer\u2019s \u201cSituation Room,\u201d a much larger gap emerged. Democrats had nearly twice the airtime of Republicans (50% versus 27%). <\/p>\n\n

On Paula Zahn\u2019s program at 8 o\u2019clock, Democrats held even more of the stage (62% Democrats versus 25% Republicans and 11% mixed). But tune into Anderson Cooper at 10 pm and it was the near reverse: From January through June on the days studied, Republicans commanded 50% of the airtime versus 29% for Democrats and 17% mixed. <\/p>\n\n

2008 Presidential Campaign Coverage
<\/strong>CNN, Dec. 31, \u201806 \u2013 June 29, \u201807 <\/p>\n\n

\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/p>\n\n

Note: \u201cOther\u201d category includes coverage of third party, both parties and other non-candidate stories<\/em> <\/p>\n\n

On the Washington-centric MSNBC, though, the programs studied proved much more similar to each other. On three of the four programs examined\u2014Tucker Carlson at 6 pm, Chris Matthews at 7 pm, and Scarborough Country at 9:00 p.m.\u2014Democrats ever so slightly edged out Republicans. The one exception was Countdown with Keith Olbermann whose coverage was fairly even \u2013 43% for Republicans and 40% for Democrats. The largest gap found was on Hardball but even here, for the days studied, the gap was only 46% Democrats to 35% Republicans. <\/p>\n\n

2008 Presidential Campaign Coverage
<\/strong>MSNBC, Dec. 31, \u201806 \u2013 June 29, \u201807 <\/p>\n\n

<\/em><\/p>\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Note: \u201cOther\u201d category includes coverage of third party, both parties and other non-candidate stories <\/em> <\/p>\n\n

\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

It is important to note that these data speak to the quantity of coverage given to each party\u2019s candidates, not tone of that coverage. A story about Republicans could be favorable, unfavorable or neutral to that party. Likewise for Democrats. <\/p>\n\n

Nonetheless, the differences suggest something about the influence of hosts and their staffs over the content of their shows. <\/p>\n\n

Candidate by candidate <\/h3>\n\n

Beyond party, which individual candidates were winning the \u201cfree media\u201d race for the most ink and airtime? <\/p>\n\n

To find out, we used the Lexis-Nexis database to conduct additional analysis. We gathered through Lexis-Nexis, all of the available newspaper and TV news content included in the Index. We then conducted a keyword search of the top three Democratic and top three Republican candidates according to survey favorability data.5<\/a><\/sup> The search was conducted on the headline and first six sentences of these stories. (As an internal check, we also initially searched mentions of some lesser known candidates and found that after the eight included here, the number of mentions sharply declines.) <\/p>\n\n

In addition we separately examined mentions of two potential candidates that received significant attention in the press the quarter: Republican Fred Thompson and New York Mayor Bloomberg, who switched his party affiliated to Independent in June. <\/p>\n\n

In the second three months of the year, Barack Obama, the first-term Illinois Senator, proved the top newsmaker on the Democratic side and overall, with the most total mentions (622) in both newspapers and on network television. Hillary Clinton, the frontrunner in the Democratic polls, was next at 566, followed by John Edwards at 367. <\/p>\n\n

Search of LexisNexis Database<\/strong>
Number of Stories with Democratic Candidate\u2019s Name in Headline or Lead Paragraphs
Apr. 1, \u201807 \u2013 June 29, \u201807 <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

\u00a0 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Hillary Clinton\/ Hillary Rodham Clinton <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

John Edwards <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Barack Obama <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Top 3 Democrats<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Newspapers <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

262 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

178 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

332 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

772<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Network TV <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

304 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

189 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

290 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

783<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total<\/strong><\/td>\n\n

566 <\/strong> <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

367 <\/strong> <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

622 <\/strong> <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

1555<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n

\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

That result is something of a reversal from the first three months of the year when Clinton led over Obama by roughly 10% (742 vs. 672). Edwards was a distant third at 249. It is also worth noting that mentions of both Clinton and Obama dropped in the second quarter while they rose for Edwards. <\/p>\n\n

Obama\u2019s lead, however, was not across the board. The former First Lady still led on network TV by a 304 to 290 margin with Edwards next at 189. In newspaper stories, Obama did better than Clinton, 332 to 262 with Edwards at 178. <\/p>\n\n

In the Republican field, the number of mentions among the three leading contenders was more evenly split, and none came close to the numbers of the top two Democrats: 383 for Senator John McCain this quarter, 341 for Rudy Giuliani and 318 for Mitt Romney. <\/p>\n\n

The candidates were just as close to each other (if not a bit closer) in the first quarter and followed the same pecking order. McCain led with 284 mentions, followed by Giuliani at 266 and Romney at 241. <\/p>\n\n

Search of LexisNexis Database
<\/strong>Number of Stories with Republican Candidate\u2019s Name in Headline or Lead Paragraphs
Apr. 1, \u201807 \u2013 June 29, \u2018’07 <\/p>\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

\u00a0 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Giuliani <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Romney <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

McCain <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Top Republicans<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Newspapers <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

124 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

124 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

123 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

371<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Network TV <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

217 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

194 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

260 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

671<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total<\/strong><\/td>\n\n

341 <\/strong> <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

318 <\/strong> <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

383 <\/strong> <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

1042<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n\n

\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

Looking at newspaper and network TV coverage separately, the newspaper competition was virtually a three-way tie with Giuliani and Romney at 124 and McCain at 123. McCain outdistanced his rivals on TV, with 260 mentions compared to 217 for Giuliani and 194 for Romney. The two newest additions to the press circuit\u2014if not to the official candidate pages\u2014seem to be catching up quickly. The candidate in waiting from Tennessee, Fred Thompson, garnered 221 mentions. And Mayor Bloomberg scored 135 mentions, certainly a more than a step behind the leading candidates. Still, considering that most of this attention came in one month, June, when he announced his party switch, and that he has not even officially announced yet, the numbers are sizable. <\/p>\n\n

Search of LexisNexis Database<\/strong>
Number of Stories with Undeclared Candidate\u2019s Name in Headline or Lead Paragraphs
Apr. 1, \u201807 \u2013 June 29, \u201807 <\/p>\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\n

Thompson <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Bloomberg <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Newspapers <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

109 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

106 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Network TV <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

112 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

29 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Total<\/strong><\/td>\n\n

221<\/strong> <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

135<\/strong> <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n\n

\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

The Lexis-Nexis search also confirms PEJ\u2019s findings that Republicans have clearly closed the coverage gap with Democrats in the last quarter. hyperlink to last quarter election page. <\/p>\n\n

In the first quarter, Clinton, Obama and Edwards generated more than twice the number of network and newspaper mentions as McCain, Giuliani and Romney\u20141663 to 791. This quarter that gap narrowed; 1,555 for the three Democrats compared to 1,042 for the three Republicans. And if you add in Thompson and Bloomberg the margin shrinks even further. <\/p>\n\n

\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

\n
\n

1.The Index studies the top five stories on five different websites, CNN.com, Yahoo News, MSNBC.com, Google News and AOL News. For details see complete index methodology<\/a>. <\/p>\n

2. PEJ began coding for Mayor Bloomberg on June 19th, the day he announced his party switch. Prior to that, any stories about him would have been coded as “other.\u201d <\/p>\n

3. According to a 2006 survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & Press, Republicans are still much more likely than Democrats to say they regularly watch the Fox News Channel (34% for Republicans, 20% for Democrats), while Democrats are more apt to turn to CNN (28% vs. 19% for Republicans). Of MSNBC\u2019s audience, 15% are Democrats and 8% are Republicans. The Pew Research Center for the People & Press, \u201cOnline Papers Modestly Boost Newspaper Readership,\u201d July 30, 2006; See: http:\/\/pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/reports\/display.php3?PageID=1067<\/a> <\/p>\n

4. The prime time cable programs captured and analyzed rotate on a daily rotation. On Fox and CNN, three out of four programs are analyzed daily. On MSNBC, it is two out of four. For the rotation schedule see the Methodology<\/a>. <\/p>\n

5. \u201cHillary Clinton Most Visible Presidential Candidate, Republicans Say Campaign is being Over-Covered,\u201d Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, July 26, 2007, http:\/\/pewresearch.org\/pubs\/553\/hillary-clinton-most-visible-presidential-candidate<\/a> <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In the second quarter of 2007, the presidential campaign took over center stage. It was the top storyline overall, accounting for 9% of the newshole and edging out any one of the three Iraq story threads. (The Iraq war coverage combined amassed 15% of the newshole this quarter, but campaign coverage supplanted each of the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sub_headline":"","sub_title":"","_crdt_document":"","_prc_public_revisions":[],"_ppp_expiration_hours":0,"_ppp_enabled":false,"ai_generated_summary":"","relatedPosts":[],"reportMaterials":[],"multiSectionReport":[],"package_parts__enabled":false,"package_parts":[],"_prc_fork_parent":0,"_prc_fork_status":"","_prc_active_fork":0,"datacite_doi":"","datacite_doi_citation":"","_prc_seo_qr_attachment_id":0,"spoken_article_player_enabled":true,"bylines":[],"acknowledgements":[],"displayBylines":true,"footnotes":"","prc_watchers":[]},"categories":[],"tags":[],"bylines":[],"collection":[],"datasets":[],"level_of_effort":[],"primary_audience":[],"information_type":[],"_post_visibility":[],"formats":[458],"_fund_pool":[],"languages":[],"regions-countries":[],"research-teams":[527],"workflow-status":[],"class_list":["post-92070","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","formats-report","research-teams-journalism"],"label":false,"post_parent":92064,"word_count":2254,"canonical_url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/the-2008-campaign-an-escalating-war\/","art_direction":false,"_embeds":[],"watchers":[],"table_of_contents":[{"id":92064,"title":"Campaign for President Takes Center Stage in Coverage","slug":"campaign-for-president-takes-center-stage-in-coverage","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/campaign-for-president-takes-center-stage-in-coverage\/","is_active":false},{"id":92070,"title":"The 2008 Campaign: An Escalating War","slug":"the-2008-campaign-an-escalating-war","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/the-2008-campaign-an-escalating-war\/","is_active":true},{"id":92073,"title":"Iraq War Coverage Drops Off In 2nd Quarter","slug":"iraq-war-coverage-drops-off-in-2nd-quarter","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/iraq-war-coverage-drops-off-in-2nd-quarter\/","is_active":false},{"id":90605,"title":"Biggest Story by Week \u2013 Virginia Tech","slug":"biggest-story-by-week-virginia-tech","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/biggest-story-by-week-virginia-tech\/","is_active":false},{"id":90630,"title":"Immigration and Paris Hilton","slug":"immigration-and-paris-hilton","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/immigration-and-paris-hilton\/","is_active":false},{"id":90612,"title":"General Topics","slug":"general-topics","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/general-topics\/","is_active":false},{"id":90620,"title":"Methodology","slug":"methodology-68-2","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/methodology-68-2\/","is_active":false},{"id":90581,"title":"Topline \u2013 Part 1","slug":"topline-part-1","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/topline-part-1\/","is_active":false},{"id":90593,"title":"Topline \u2013 Part 2","slug":"topline-part-2","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/topline-part-2\/","is_active":false}],"report_materials":"","report_pagination":{"current_post":{"id":92070,"title":"The 2008 Campaign: An Escalating War","slug":"the-2008-campaign-an-escalating-war","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/the-2008-campaign-an-escalating-war\/","is_active":true,"page_num":2},"next_post":{"id":92073,"title":"Iraq War Coverage Drops Off In 2nd Quarter","slug":"iraq-war-coverage-drops-off-in-2nd-quarter","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/iraq-war-coverage-drops-off-in-2nd-quarter\/","is_active":false,"page_num":3},"previous_post":{"id":92064,"title":"Campaign for President Takes Center Stage in Coverage","slug":"campaign-for-president-takes-center-stage-in-coverage","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/campaign-for-president-takes-center-stage-in-coverage\/","is_active":false,"page_num":1},"pagination_items":[{"id":92064,"title":"Campaign for President Takes Center Stage in Coverage","slug":"campaign-for-president-takes-center-stage-in-coverage","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/campaign-for-president-takes-center-stage-in-coverage\/","is_active":false,"page_num":1},{"id":92070,"title":"The 2008 Campaign: An Escalating War","slug":"the-2008-campaign-an-escalating-war","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/the-2008-campaign-an-escalating-war\/","is_active":true,"page_num":2},{"id":92073,"title":"Iraq War Coverage Drops Off In 2nd Quarter","slug":"iraq-war-coverage-drops-off-in-2nd-quarter","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/iraq-war-coverage-drops-off-in-2nd-quarter\/","is_active":false,"page_num":3},{"id":90605,"title":"Biggest Story by Week \u2013 Virginia Tech","slug":"biggest-story-by-week-virginia-tech","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/biggest-story-by-week-virginia-tech\/","is_active":false,"page_num":4},{"id":90630,"title":"Immigration and Paris Hilton","slug":"immigration-and-paris-hilton","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/immigration-and-paris-hilton\/","is_active":false,"page_num":5},{"id":90612,"title":"General Topics","slug":"general-topics","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/general-topics\/","is_active":false,"page_num":6},{"id":90620,"title":"Methodology","slug":"methodology-68-2","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/methodology-68-2\/","is_active":false,"page_num":7},{"id":90581,"title":"Topline \u2013 Part 1","slug":"topline-part-1","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/topline-part-1\/","is_active":false,"page_num":8},{"id":90593,"title":"Topline \u2013 Part 2","slug":"topline-part-2","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/08\/20\/topline-part-2\/","is_active":false,"page_num":9}]},"parent_info":{"parent_title":"Campaign for President Takes Center Stage in Coverage","parent_id":92064},"materialsOrdered":[],"chaptersOrdered":[],"partsOrdered":[],"partsEnabled":false,"datacite_doi":"","prc_seo_data":{"title":"The 2008 Campaign: An Escalating War","description":"In the second quarter of 2007, the presidential campaign took over center stage. It was the top storyline overall, accounting for 9% of the newshole and edging out any one…","og_title":"The 2008 Campaign: An Escalating War","og_description":"","schema_type":"Article","noindex":false,"canonical_url":"","primary_terms":[],"custom_schema":[],"og_image":0,"indexnow_submitted_at":null,"gsc_index_status":null},"prepublish_checks":{"prc-image-alt-text":{"status":"incomplete","message":"1 image is missing alt text.","data":{"count":1}},"prc-about-this-research":{"status":"incomplete","message":"Add an \"About this research\" details block.","data":null},"prc-paragraph-count":{"status":"complete","message":"Found 49 paragraphs.","data":{"count":49}},"prc-internal-link":{"status":"complete","message":"Found 4 internal links.","data":{"count":4}}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"relatedPostsOrdered":[],"bylinesOrdered":[],"acknowledgementsOrdered":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92070","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92070"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92070\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":130954,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92070\/revisions\/130954"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92070"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92070"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92070"},{"taxonomy":"bylines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/bylines?post=92070"},{"taxonomy":"collection","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collection?post=92070"},{"taxonomy":"datasets","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/datasets?post=92070"},{"taxonomy":"level_of_effort","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/level_of_effort?post=92070"},{"taxonomy":"primary_audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/primary_audience?post=92070"},{"taxonomy":"information_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/information_type?post=92070"},{"taxonomy":"_post_visibility","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_post_visibility?post=92070"},{"taxonomy":"formats","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/formats?post=92070"},{"taxonomy":"_fund_pool","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_fund_pool?post=92070"},{"taxonomy":"languages","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/languages?post=92070"},{"taxonomy":"regions-countries","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/regions-countries?post=92070"},{"taxonomy":"research-teams","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/research-teams?post=92070"},{"taxonomy":"workflow-status","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/workflow-status?post=92070"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}