{"id":90707,"date":"2007-04-12T00:00:01","date_gmt":"2007-04-12T05:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/2007\/04\/12\/pej-talk-show-index-april-1-6-2007\/"},"modified":"2024-04-14T04:12:33","modified_gmt":"2024-04-14T09:12:33","slug":"pej-talk-show-index-april-1-6-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/04\/12\/pej-talk-show-index-april-1-6-2007\/","title":{"rendered":"Talk Hosts Get the Most From the Mideast"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n\n

On his April 5 show, radio host Michael Savage ripped House Speaker Nancy Pelosi\u2019s meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in a segment he called \u201cDamascus Does Nancy.\u201d\u00a0\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

\u201cShe was gutsy enough to make the sign of the Cross in a mosque,\u201d Savage said. \u201cBut she was not gutsy enough to make the sign of the bird to Assad.\u201d\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

On April 3, Rush Limbaugh offered his view of Pelosi\u2019s motivation. \u201cShe\u2019s over there trying to undermine the United States<\/em>,\u201d (Limbaugh\u2019s emphasis) he said. \u201cShe\u2019s the queen bee.\u2019\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

The same subject was at the core of an April 6 shout fest on the Fox News Channel\u2019s \u201cHannity & Colmes.\u201d Democratic commentator Jane Fleming lauded Pelosi for doing \u201cexactly what the Iraqi study group said to do\u2026to engage in a dialogue with Syria\u2026\u201d Republican pundit Amy Holmes countered that Pelosi \u201ctried to usurp the power of the executive branch to conduct foreign policy.\u201d\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

If ever a subject was a sure bet to get the attention of the talk hosts, who live on controversy, it was a politically polarizing figure (Pelosi) talking to a distrusted foreign leader (Assad), who has been ostracized by an unpopular president (Bush) on issues at the heart of this country\u2019s divisive foreign policy (the war on terror and the conflict in Iraq).<\/p>\n\n

Last week was a crowded one in the talk show universe. Iran released its British hostages, Senator John McCain decried media coverage of Iraq, and the presidential candidates revealed their fundraising prowess. All of these were big topics. But Pelosi\u2019s Damascus dialogue got significant air play, twice as much in talk radio as it did in the news media overall. It filled 10% of the airtime on the cable and radio talk shows, making it the fourth biggest topic of the week, according to PEJ\u2019s Talk Show Index for April 1 through April 6.\u00a0\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

For the first time since mid-February, the Iraq policy debate (at 19%) was the top talk topic of the week. It edged out the conflict with Iran (18%) which was punctuated by the release of the captive Brits. The 2008 battle for the White House was next at 16%. This is also the second week in a row\u2014but only the second time since the Talk Index began in January\u2014that four different subjects each filled at least 10% of the talk newshole.<\/p>\n\n

Taking a closer look at which hosts chose to tackle the Pelosi trip also reveals a basic tenet of the talk show culture. It was a bigger story on radio (about 38 minutes) than on cable (about 30 minutes). And it was overwhelming the conservative hosts who were critical of Pelosi\u2014such as Limbaugh, Savage, and Sean Hannity\u2014who spent time on the issue while their liberal counterparts were silent.\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

What\u2019s the moral of the story? In the talk business, it\u2019s much easier to play offense than defense. That also helps explain why conservative radio talkers have been relatively silent about the U.S. attorneys scandal engulfing Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.<\/p>\n\n

The Talk Show Index, released each Friday, is designed to provide news consumers, journalists and researchers with hard data about what stories and topics are most frequently dissected and discussed in the media universe of talk and opinion\u2014a segment of the media that spans across both prime time cable and radio. (See About the Talk Show Index.)<\/a> PEJ\u2019s Talk Show Index includes seven prime time cable shows and five radio talk hosts and is a subset of our News Coverage Index<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n

Talk show interest in the investigation of the fired U.S. attorneys fell sharply last week, as was the case with PEJ\u2019s general News Coverage Index. The story, which was the leading talk topic for the last three weeks in March, dropped to just 2% of the talk time, putting it in seventh place among topics. Only the cable hosts devoted time to an issue that seems to be on the back burner until Gonzales\u2019s much anticipated April 17 appearance before Congress.<\/p>\n\n

On the April 5 edition of CNN\u2019s \u201cLou Dobbs Tonight,\u201d correspondent Brian Todd provided a sense of those April 17 stakes, at least from the AG\u2019s perspective. He reported that Gonzales \u201cis now hunkered down preparing for it. Justice officials tell us he is staying behind closed doors, cancelling a family vacation and will go through mock grilling sessions, possibly with outside legal advisors.\u201d\u00a0\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

Both the conflict with Iran and the Iraq policy debate got serious attention in both the cable and radio talk sectors. <\/p>\n\n

When it comes to the debate over Iraq, the April 2 monologues of liberal Randi Rhodes and conservative Sean Hannity served as proxies for the most basic, boiled-down anti-administration and pro-administration views of the conflict: \u00a0\u201cThe war is a costly quagmire\u201d versus \u201cWe can win if we remain steadfast.\u201d\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

On her April 2 show, Rhodes used John McCain\u2019s trip to Baghdad to attack the GOP presidential hopeful\u2019s assertions that the security situation on the ground has improved. <\/p>\n\n

\u201cThe safe streets of Iraq?\u201d Rhodes declared. \u201cJohn McCain took his little stroll wearing armor\u2026John McCain had more bodyguards with him than P. Diddy getting to the MTV Awards.\u201d\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

Conversely, Hannity took aim at the Democrats\u2019 legislative efforts to reverse President Bush\u2019s course in Iraq. <\/p>\n\n

\u201cHarry Reid\u2026and his fellow Democrats are prepared to leave our troops on the battlefield without food, without equipment, without bullets, without reinforcements and the ability to defeat the enemy,\u201d he declared.\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

The connection between the Iraq war and the global battle against terrorism was the focus of another political dispute last week that helped make the war on terror the eighth biggest talk topic at 2%.<\/p>\n\n

The subject arose from a memo advising Democrats not to use the phrase \u201cglobal war on terrorism\u201d to describe the situation in Iraq because it falsely links that conflict to the struggle against Al Qaeda. Republicans vocally disagreed. <\/p>\n\n

Some hosts were quick to pounce on that memo. \u00a0On his April 4 show, Limbaugh mocked the idea that \u201cthere is no war on terror\u201d and accused Democrats of \u201cdoing their best to convince everybody there is no reason for a war on terror.\u201d <\/p>\n\n

It was another example of how in the talk universe, offense trumps defense.<\/p>\n\n

Mark Jurkowitz of PEJ<\/em><\/p>\n\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n\n

Top Ten Stories in the Talk Show Index<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n

1. Iraq Policy Debate – 19% <\/address>\n\n
2. Iran – 18%
<\/address>\n\n
3. 2008 Campaign – 16%<\/address>\n\n
4. Pelosi Trip to the Middle East – 10% <\/address>\n\n
5. Global Warming – 3%<\/address>\n\n
6. Immigration – 3%
<\/address>\n\n
7. Fired US Attorney Controversy – 2%
<\/address>\n\n
8. War on Terror General – 2%<\/address>\n\n
9. US Economic Numbers – 2%<\/address>\n\n
10. Democratic-led Congress – 1% <\/address>\n\n\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n

Top Ten Stories in the broader News Coverage Index<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n

1. Iran – 13% <\/address>\n\n
2. 2008 Campaign – 10%<\/address>\n\n
3. Iraq Policy Debate – 9%
<\/address>\n\n
4. Global Warming – 5%<\/address>\n\n
5. Pelosi Trip to the Middle East – 5%<\/address>\n\n
6. Events in Iraq – 4%<\/address>\n\n
7. Solomon Islands Tsunami – 2%<\/address>\n\n
8. Iraq Homefront – 2%<\/address>\n\n
9. Immigration – 2%<\/address>\n\n
10. US Economic Numbers – 2%<\/address>\n\n

Click here<\/a> to read the methodology behind the Talk Show Index. <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Iranian hostage situation and the argument over Iraq policy were hot topics on the cable and radio talk shows last week. But in some ways, the U.S. Speaker of the House’s decision to talk to the President of Syria shed even more light on how the talk universe really works.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sub_headline":"PEJ Talk Show Index April 1 - 6, 2007","sub_title":"PEJ Talk Show Index April 1 - 6, 2007","_prc_public_revisions":[],"_ppp_expiration_hours":0,"_ppp_enabled":false,"ai_generated_summary":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"apple_news_api_id":"","apple_news_api_revision":"","apple_news_api_created_at":"","apple_news_api_modified_at":"","apple_news_api_share_url":"","apple_news_api_pending":"","apple_news_is_preview":false,"apple_news_is_hidden":false,"relatedPosts":[],"reportMaterials":[],"multiSectionReport":[],"package_parts__enabled":false,"package_parts":[],"datacite_doi":"","datacite_doi_citation":"","_prc_seo_qr_attachment_id":0,"spoken_article_player_enabled":true,"displayBylines":true,"footnotes":"","prc_watchers":[],"_prc_fork_parent":0,"_prc_fork_status":"","_prc_active_fork":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[],"tags":[],"bylines":[],"collection":[],"datasets":[],"level_of_effort":[],"primary_audience":[],"information_type":[],"_post_visibility":[],"formats":[458],"_fund_pool":[],"languages":[],"regions-countries":[],"research-teams":[527],"workflow-status":[],"class_list":["post-90707","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","formats-report","research-teams-journalism"],"label":false,"post_parent":0,"word_count":1119,"canonical_url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2007\/04\/12\/pej-talk-show-index-april-1-6-2007\/","art_direction":false,"_embeds":[],"watchers":[],"table_of_contents":[],"report_materials":"","report_pagination":{"current_post":null,"next_post":null,"previous_post":null,"pagination_items":[]},"parent_info":{"parent_title":"Talk Hosts Get the Most From the Mideast","parent_id":90707},"materialsOrdered":[],"chaptersOrdered":[],"partsOrdered":[],"partsEnabled":false,"datacite_doi":"","prc_seo_data":{"title":"Talk Hosts Get the Most From the Mideast","description":"The Iranian hostage situation and the argument over Iraq policy were hot topics on the cable and radio talk shows last week. But in some ways, the U.S. Speaker of the House’s decision to talk to the President of Syria shed even more light on how the talk universe really works.","og_title":"Talk Hosts Get the Most From the Mideast","og_description":"The Iranian hostage situation and the argument over Iraq policy were hot topics on the cable and radio talk shows last week. But in some ways, the U.S. Speaker of the House’s decision to talk to the President of Syria shed even more light on how the talk universe really works.","schema_type":"Article","noindex":false,"canonical_url":"","primary_terms":[],"custom_schema":[],"og_image":0,"indexnow_submitted_at":null,"gsc_index_status":null},"prepublish_checks":{"prc-image-alt-text":{"status":"incomplete","message":"1 image is missing alt text.","data":{"count":1}},"prc-about-this-research":{"status":"incomplete","message":"Add an \"About this research\" details block.","data":null},"prc-paragraph-count":{"status":"complete","message":"Found 26 paragraphs.","data":{"count":26}},"prc-internal-link":{"status":"complete","message":"Found 3 internal links.","data":{"count":3}}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"relatedPostsOrdered":[],"bylinesOrdered":[],"acknowledgementsOrdered":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90707","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90707"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90707\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":130585,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90707\/revisions\/130585"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90707"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90707"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90707"},{"taxonomy":"bylines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/bylines?post=90707"},{"taxonomy":"collection","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collection?post=90707"},{"taxonomy":"datasets","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/datasets?post=90707"},{"taxonomy":"level_of_effort","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/level_of_effort?post=90707"},{"taxonomy":"primary_audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/primary_audience?post=90707"},{"taxonomy":"information_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/information_type?post=90707"},{"taxonomy":"_post_visibility","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_post_visibility?post=90707"},{"taxonomy":"formats","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/formats?post=90707"},{"taxonomy":"_fund_pool","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_fund_pool?post=90707"},{"taxonomy":"languages","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/languages?post=90707"},{"taxonomy":"regions-countries","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/regions-countries?post=90707"},{"taxonomy":"research-teams","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/research-teams?post=90707"},{"taxonomy":"workflow-status","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/workflow-status?post=90707"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}