Even when they were covered, PSCs were often tangential aspects of larger stories about other Iraq-related issues or events. Many sprang from U.S. government actions or reports, such as the Washington Post\u2019s April 23, 2005 story \u201cContractor, Army Office Fell Short\u201d which ran on the front of the financial section.. Another example was USA Today\u2019s July 29, 2005 story \u201cU.S. Contractors spent $766 M on Security in Iraq, GAO says.\u201d Pieces like these discuss problems with contractors, but don\u2019t delve heavily into what the contractors are doing in Iraq. <\/p>\n\n
Other stories about PSCs were often less about what exactly the companies were doing in Iraq than questions about financial accountability. The first piece the Washington Post did that used any of our search terms was an October 9, 2003 story headlined, \u201cSpending On Iraq Sets off Gold Rush,\u201d with the subhead \u201cLawmakers Fear U.S. is Losing Control of Funds.\u201d <\/p>\n\n
Some articles just touched on the use of PSCs as they focused primarily on the war. For instance, in \u201cWar, Just a Click Away,\u201d which ran on Washingtonpost.com on August 10, 2005, contractors are just a small part of an essay on the growth of war coverage online. Or consider the New York Times piece \u201cOne Maker Looks Inside, Not to Hollywood,\u201d which ran on May 8, 2006. It was about a new video game about PSCs, but didn\u2019t address the issue in a larger context. <\/p>\n\n
The cable news outlets dealt with the issue mostly in broad strokes. In June 2006 CNN several times aired a report on \u201cCivilian Contractors in Iraq,\u201d but that report largely focused on the dangers contractors were facing in the country, not specifically the use of PSCs as stand-ins for U.S. troops. Fox News aired two stories that touched on the issue \u2013 and one of those was a December 2, 2005 segment of the show Hannity & Colmes that was a broad \u201cAnalysis of the Situation in Iraq.\u201d The discussion, in part, centered on a video that purported to show British PSC employees firing on civilians. <\/p>\n\n
Most local newspapers barely touched the topic of PSCs. Even among big metro dailies, like the Dallas Morning News, Seattle Times and San Diego Union-Tribune (which each ran one story), the PSC issue received very little attention. If they published any at all, most local papers ran one piece on the issue, often in the opinion pages and by non-journalists. <\/p>\n\n
The Richmond Times Dispatch, for instance, ran an op\/ed from a student at American University on August 22, 2005 headlined, \u201cHow Do Private Contractors Fit Military\u2019s Mission?\u201d The Orlando Sentinel ran an op\/ed from a contributor on August 8, 2005 with the headline, \u201cExpect Private Military Forces to Flex More Muscle.\u201d The Chicago Sun-Times published an Op\/Ed piece from an outside contributor on September 10, 2006 headlined, \u201c5 of the Worst War Profiteers: There\u2019s Money to be Made \u2013 By Any Means Necessary.\u201d <\/p>\n\n
Other stories that included a mention of our key words and phrases were company or personality profiles, specific allegations against a firm or reports of death or injury. <\/p>\n\n
[1]<\/p>\n\n\n
These deaths and other incidents did generate stories. National papers and the bigger metro dailies reported big gun battles and casualties. Smaller local papers published stories about injured or killed members of their communities. And other local papers based closed to big PSC companies wrote stories when their local employer suffered casualties. <\/p>\n\n
As part of this examination we entered the names of all the members of the Private Security Company Association of Iraq through the Nexis database over the same time period we checked our key phrases. The searches generated a few hits for some PSCs and dozens for others. The stories we found were a mix of things, but incident stories dominated. <\/p>\n\n
[2]<\/p>\n\n\n
Two newspapers located near Blackwater headquarters, the Virginian-Pilot in Norfolk Virginia and the News & Observer in Raleigh, North Carolina, accounted for a good deal of the coverage of that firm. To get a sense of how those outlets covered the best-known PSC, we searched any stories they published that contained the term \u201cBlackwater\u201d over the time period of our study. The News & Observer published 75 stories with the word \u201cBlackwater\u201d and the Virginian-Pilot ran 83 articles that included that term. Only about a quarter of the coverage was about the issue and role of PSCs as private military forces.<\/p>\n\n
More of the News & Observer coverage focused on Blackwater\u2019s ties to Halliburton, the giant military contractor firm that hired Blackwater to provide security for its personnel, facilities and convoys.\u00a0 The coverage often examined the issue of cost overruns and billing. Many of these stories broke new ground on that financing issue. Also noteworthy was a six-part series in 2004 on the deaths of the Blackwater personnel in Fallujah, \u201cThe Bridge,\u201d some of which dealt with the larger questions around PSCs. The Virginian-Pilot primarily covered Blackwater as a local business, reporting on everything from the company requesting permits for roads and firings ranges to its place in the world of private security companies. Its 2006 six-part series, \u201cBlackwater: Inside America\u2019s Private Army,\u201d also delved into the question of PSCs being used as soldiers. <\/p>\n\n
\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n