{"id":90225,"date":"2009-02-09T00:00:01","date_gmt":"2009-02-09T05:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/2009\/02\/09\/new-coverage-index-february-2-8-2009\/"},"modified":"2024-04-14T04:12:25","modified_gmt":"2024-04-14T09:12:25","slug":"new-coverage-index-february-2-8-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2009\/02\/09\/new-coverage-index-february-2-8-2009\/","title":{"rendered":"The News Narrative Turns Bearish on Obama"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n\n

Two different stories combined to create one major media narrative last week\u2014a new President off to a shaky start. <\/p>\n\n

For the second week in a row the economic crisis was the dominant story in the news, filling 44% of the Feb. 2- Feb. 8 newshole in the weekly News Coverage Index produced by the Pew Research Center\u2019s Project for Excellence in Journalism. <\/p>\n\n

The only other subject to generate significant attention was a related one, the new Obama Administration at 17% (up from 7% a week earlier). <\/p>\n\n

But both stories contained themes depicted as negative for Obama\u2014problems winning Republican votes on the stimulus package and no fewer than four Presidential nominees tainted by tax problems. <\/p>\n\n

The President seemed to fuel rather than dispel the storyline by admitting \u201cI screwed up\u201d during a round of TV interviews. Obama \u201chas all but lost control of the agenda in Washington at a time when he simply can’t afford to do so,\u201d wrote Newsweek\u2019s Michael Hirsh. MSNBC host Joe Scarborough went further, wondering if Obama was off to one of the roughest debuts in recent presidential history. <\/p>\n\n

If the storyline seemed to pivot dramatically from a heady inauguration to a rocky transition, that sense was significantly magnified by the two platforms offering instant updates of the Beltway scoreboard, and both of them now firmly ideological. On cable news, a dominant theme among talking heads was Obama stumbling at the starting gate. On talk radio, conservative hosts grew even more aggressive in staking out their opposition to the new President.

Obama Gets Thumped on the Talk Shows<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n

During his brief tenure in office, Obama has expressed a clear distaste for elements of the talk show culture. The New York Post reported that he told a group of House Republicans that, \u201cYou can\u2019t just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done.\u201d In a speech on the stimulus plan, Obama pointedly declared that the American people did not \u201csend us here to get bogged down\u201d in the \u201csame talking points, the same cable chatter.\u201d <\/p>\n\n

\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

Such talk is not likely to silence Obama\u2019s intended targets. The media talk culture that dominates cable news in prime time and news\/talk stations on radio tends to amplify the one or two top subjects in the news, and last week was no exception. The general media measured by PEJ\u2019s News Coverage Index devoted about three-fifths of their coverage to the economy and the new Administration. But the talk show conversation was even more focused on those two subjects. <\/p>\n\n

The prime time cable talk programs studied\u2014Campbell Brown and Lou Dobbs on CNN, Sean Hannity and Bill O\u2019Reilly on Fox, and MSNBC\u2019s Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow and David Shuster\u2014devoted 81% of time studied to them\u201462% on the economic crisis and another 19% to the Obama Administration last week. <\/p>\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n

The radio hosts\u2014conservatives Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Michael Savage and liberals Ed Schultz and Randi Rhodes\u2014divided their energies more evenly among the Obama-centric topics. They spent 43% of their airtime on the financial crisis and another 30% on the early days of the Obama team. <\/p>\n\n

On talk radio, conservatives\u2014perhaps looking to reprise 1993 when right-leaning hosts battered new President Bill Clinton\u2014were setting themselves up as the vanguard of Obama opposition. <\/p>\n\n

\u201cHere we are, the conservative underground, conservatism in exile,\u201d declared Sean Hannity on his Feb. 4 radio show, before taking on the stimulus. \u201cThis socialism bill is like a rotting corpse,\u201d he declared, \u201cand public support has already dropped from below fifty percent.\u201d <\/p>\n\n

Limbaugh fill-in Mark Steyn also took comfort from poll numbers. \u201cPresident Obama\u2019s approval ratings have tumbled, tumbled to sixty-six percent according to Gallup, fifty-five percent in another poll,\u201d he declared. \u201cA couple more weeks like this\u2026he could be down there in the George W. Bush basement of approval ratings.\u201d <\/p>\n\n

Even among friendlier talkers, the new President was having a tough week. \u201cIf someone had told me\u2026that the first twenty days of the Obama administration were going to be plagued by all kinds of problems when it comes to who\u2019s gonna be in the Cabinet, I would have said \u2018no way,\u2019\u201d declared liberal Ed Schulz the day Tom Daschle withdrew as Obama’s Health and Human Services Secretary.\u00a0\u201cThis has really been a curveball to me as a talk show host.\u201d <\/p>\n\n

On prime time cable, some conservative voices attacked the stimulus package as laden with pork. On his Feb. 5 Fox News Channel program, O\u2019Reilly blasted Obama for allowing \u201cNancy Pelosi and her far left crew to hijack\u201d the measure. \u201cThe majority of Americans are now opposed to spending a trillion dollars on social engineering and other liberal causes,\u201d he added. <\/p>\n\n

A few nights earlier on Hannity\u2019s Fox program, ex-Congressman John Kasich had a basic and chilling warning about the stimulus: \u201cThis is a disaster for families and for children.\u201d <\/p>\n\n

[stimulus]<\/p>\n\n\n

The topic on Campbell Brown\u2019s Feb. 3 CNN show was the damage from the Daschle withdrawal. \u201cBig mea culpa from President Obama today just as his new administration is starting to look a little bit like politics as usual,\u201d said Brown. \u201cTo have this kind of flop just two weeks in is very damaging,\u201d added the Washington Post\u2019s Dana Milbank. <\/p>\n\n

Obama even found himself getting tweaked, albeit in a more light-hearted fashion, from a major liberal cable voice. During her opening monologue on Feb. 3, MSNBC\u2019s Maddow made the case that the President erred by trying to reach out to Republicans, who were overwhelmingly unconvinced, for help on the stimulus. <\/p>\n\n

\u201cPresident Obama may need some relationship advice,\u201d Maddow ventured. \u201cIn short, President Obama appears to be stuck on somebody who does not feel the same way about him\u2026He keeps giving. They keep taking.\u201d <\/p>\n\n

In many corners of the talk universe last week, there was a torrent of discouraging words about the new President.

<\/strong><\/p>\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n

Lead Newsmakers<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n

With Obama at the center of the stimulus debate and the Daschle flap, he was the top newsmaker again last week. In all, he was the lead newsmaker (meaning he was the focus of at least half the story) in 16% of the roughly 1,300 stories measured in the weekly NCI\u2014the same percentage as last week. <\/p>\n\n

The positioning of two of the top five newsmakers also says something about the kind of coverage the President generated last week. Daschle, the HHS selection who dropped out after embarrassing revelations of delinquent taxes, was the second-leading newsmaker (5% of the stories). Judd Gregg, the Republican Senator from New Hampshire tapped by Obama to become Commerce Secretary, was well behind, at 1%. In another week, Obama\u2019s nod toward bi-partisanship in selecting Gregg might have been a bigger story. Last week, it took a back seat to the Daschle debacle. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who was revealed to be battling cancer last week, was tied with Gregg at 1% <\/p>\n\n

One public figure having a bad news week was just ahead of Gregg and Ginsburg, also at 1%. Olympic swimming phenom Michael Phelps was on the list thanks to the fallout from his highly publicized pot smoking episode. <\/p>\n\n

The Rest of the Week\u2019s News<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n

The drop-off in coverage after the two dominant stories last week was precipitous. The No. 3 story from Feb. 2-8, as measured by PEJ\u2019s News Coverage Index, was coverage of Super Bowl XLIII, a thriller won by the Pittsburgh Steelers over the Arizona Cardinals 27-23, on a last minute touchdown. It filled only 2% of the newshole. <\/p>\n\n

The two next biggest stories involved the two wars the U.S. is actively engaged in. The news from Iraq was fairly upbeat. Key elections went off peacefully and produced results favorable to U.S. policymakers. But in clear signal of how far Iraq has fallen on the media\u2019s to-do list, the situation inside that country, including a crucial election, only accounted for 2% of the newshole last week. In many ways, the U.S. media and public seem to have moved on from the story. <\/p>\n\n

The story from Afghanistan was grimmer, where news of militants disrupting an important U.S. supply route into the country helped fill 2% of the newshole. <\/p>\n\n

About the NCI<\/strong><\/p>\n\n

PEJ\u2019s weekly News Coverage Index examines the news agenda of 55 different outlets from five sectors of the media: print, online, network TV, cable and radio. (See List of Outlets<\/a>.) The weekly study, which includes some 1,300 stories, is designed to provide news consumers, journalists and researchers with hard data about what stories and topics the media are covering, the trajectories of that media narrative and differences among news platforms. The percentages are based on “newshole,” or the space devoted to each subject in print and online and time on radio and TV. (See Our Methodology<\/a>.) In addition, these reports also include a rundown of the week\u2019s leading newsmakers, a designation given to people or institutions who account for at least 50% of a given story.<\/p>\n\n

Mark Jurkowitz of PEJ <\/em> <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It wasn’t much of a honeymoon, at least so far. And nowhere did the discussion of the economic crisis and the new Administration seem to beat up the President more roundly than in the studios of cable talk shows and, of course, on the radio.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sub_headline":"PEJ News Coverage Index Feb. 2 - 8, 2009","sub_title":"PEJ News Coverage Index Feb. 2 - 8, 2009","_prc_public_revisions":[],"_ppp_expiration_hours":0,"_ppp_enabled":false,"ai_generated_summary":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"apple_news_api_id":"","apple_news_api_revision":"","apple_news_api_created_at":"","apple_news_api_modified_at":"","apple_news_api_share_url":"","apple_news_api_pending":"","apple_news_is_preview":false,"apple_news_is_hidden":false,"relatedPosts":[],"reportMaterials":[],"multiSectionReport":[],"package_parts__enabled":false,"package_parts":[],"datacite_doi":"","datacite_doi_citation":"","_prc_seo_qr_attachment_id":0,"spoken_article_player_enabled":true,"displayBylines":true,"footnotes":"","prc_watchers":[],"_prc_fork_parent":0,"_prc_fork_status":"","_prc_active_fork":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[340],"tags":[],"bylines":[],"collection":[],"datasets":[],"level_of_effort":[],"primary_audience":[],"information_type":[],"_post_visibility":[],"formats":[458],"_fund_pool":[],"languages":[],"regions-countries":[],"research-teams":[527],"workflow-status":[],"class_list":["post-90225","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-presidents-press","formats-report","research-teams-journalism"],"label":false,"post_parent":0,"word_count":1486,"canonical_url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2009\/02\/09\/new-coverage-index-february-2-8-2009\/","art_direction":false,"_embeds":[],"watchers":[],"table_of_contents":[],"report_materials":"","report_pagination":{"current_post":null,"next_post":null,"previous_post":null,"pagination_items":[]},"parent_info":{"parent_title":"The News Narrative Turns Bearish on Obama","parent_id":90225},"materialsOrdered":[],"chaptersOrdered":[],"partsOrdered":[],"partsEnabled":false,"datacite_doi":"","prc_seo_data":{"title":"The News Narrative Turns Bearish on Obama","description":"It wasn’t much of a honeymoon, at least so far. And nowhere did the discussion of the economic crisis and the new Administration seem to beat up the President more roundly than in the studios of cable talk shows and, of course, on the radio.","og_title":"The News Narrative Turns Bearish on Obama","og_description":"It wasn’t much of a honeymoon, at least so far. And nowhere did the discussion of the economic crisis and the new Administration seem to beat up the President more roundly than in the studios of cable talk shows and, of course, on the radio.","schema_type":"Article","noindex":false,"canonical_url":"","primary_terms":[],"custom_schema":[],"og_image":0,"indexnow_submitted_at":null,"gsc_index_status":null},"prepublish_checks":{"prc-image-alt-text":{"status":"incomplete","message":"3 images are missing alt text.","data":{"count":3}},"prc-about-this-research":{"status":"incomplete","message":"Add an \"About this research\" details block.","data":null},"prc-paragraph-count":{"status":"complete","message":"Found 31 paragraphs.","data":{"count":31}},"prc-internal-link":{"status":"complete","message":"Found 2 internal links.","data":{"count":2}}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"relatedPostsOrdered":[],"bylinesOrdered":[],"acknowledgementsOrdered":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90225","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90225"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90225\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":130398,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90225\/revisions\/130398"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90225"},{"taxonomy":"bylines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/bylines?post=90225"},{"taxonomy":"collection","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collection?post=90225"},{"taxonomy":"datasets","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/datasets?post=90225"},{"taxonomy":"level_of_effort","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/level_of_effort?post=90225"},{"taxonomy":"primary_audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/primary_audience?post=90225"},{"taxonomy":"information_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/information_type?post=90225"},{"taxonomy":"_post_visibility","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_post_visibility?post=90225"},{"taxonomy":"formats","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/formats?post=90225"},{"taxonomy":"_fund_pool","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_fund_pool?post=90225"},{"taxonomy":"languages","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/languages?post=90225"},{"taxonomy":"regions-countries","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/regions-countries?post=90225"},{"taxonomy":"research-teams","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/research-teams?post=90225"},{"taxonomy":"workflow-status","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/workflow-status?post=90225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}