{"id":90175,"date":"2009-07-27T00:00:01","date_gmt":"2009-07-27T05:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/2009\/07\/27\/pej-news-coverage-index-july-20-26-2009\/"},"modified":"2024-04-14T04:12:26","modified_gmt":"2024-04-14T09:12:26","slug":"pej-news-coverage-index-july-20-26-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2009\/07\/27\/pej-news-coverage-index-july-20-26-2009\/","title":{"rendered":"From Health Care to \u201cSkip\u201d Gates, Obama Makes Big News"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n\n

Health care reform, an issue that has long simmered on the media back burner, finally exploded into the headlines last week, accounting for one-quarter of the overall coverage. Yet late in the week, the health care debate took a back seat to the arrest of a black professor\u00a0 that exposed the \u201cthird rail\u201d of American society\u2014race.\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

Together, the two stories accounted for nearly 40% of the coverage from July 20-26. And in both cases, Barack Obama played a key role. <\/p>\n\n

The debate over health care legislation filled 25% of the newshole last week and was the top story in four of the five media sectors, according to the Pew Research Center\u2019s Project for Excellence in Journalism. That marked the most weekly attention to that subject since PEJ began the News Coverage Index in 2007, more than doubling the previous high water mark (11%), which occurred the week of July 13-19, 2009.\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n

Indeed, coverage of the health care issue has traditionally ranged from sparse to non-existent. In 2007 and 2008, it accounted for less than 1% of the overall newshole. But the subject has generated more media scrutiny in recent weeks as it moved squarely into the political arena. Last week, as Obama convened a press conference and his timetable for legislation seemed to be slipping, coverage spiked dramatically\u2014evidence of the media\u2019s proclivity to pay more attention when complex issues are framed by a heated Washington debate. <\/p>\n\n

Another story that emerged to dominate coverage late in the week was fueled by an Obama remark during his July 22 press conference on health care. The July 16 arrest of prominent black scholar Henry Louis Gates in his Cambridge home by a policeman investigating a break-in had already generated attention in the media. But it became a supercharged story when the president, in response to a reporter\u2019s question, declared that he didn\u2019t know \u201cnot having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played in that,\u201d but that the police had \u201cacted stupidly\u201d in the case. <\/p>\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n

In an instant, the arrest was not simply a story about the racial climate. It also injected Obama directly into a politically charged controversy at the dangerous intersection of law enforcement and civil rights. The Gates case was the No. 3 story at 12%, just behind the economy. But it built momentum over time and was the top story in the second half of the week, filling 25% of the newshole from July 23-26. <\/p>\n\n

The second-biggest story last week was the economic crisis, which also filled 12% of the newshole\u2014very much in keeping with the level of attention (13%) it has attracted for the past three months. The fourth-biggest story (4%) was the conflict in Afghanistan, with much of the narrative focused on the plight of a U.S. soldier captured by the Taliban. <\/p>\n\n

The fifth-biggest story (also 4%) was the 40-year anniversary of the Apollo 11 mission that put a man on the moon. Much of the coverage seemed to reflect nostalgia for a bygone era when space exploration was both a national priority and a source of collective pride. <\/p>\n\n

The Health Care Debate <\/strong> <\/p>\n\n

One sign that health care has become a more polarizing and political issue can be seen in last week\u2019s coverage patterns. The two media sectors that include the ideological and debate-oriented talk shows devoted the most attention to the story\u201438% on cable news and 35% on radio. <\/p>\n\n

In addition, a PEJ examination of \u00a0storylines in last week\u2019s coverage indicates that the horse race aspect of health care reform\u2014the politics and strategy behind the legislative fight\u2014was the overwhelmingly dominant theme. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n

\u201cThe charged battle to overhaul health care intensified Monday as President Obama accused GOP critics of putting politics ahead of policy,\u201d said a July 20 story on CNN.com. \u201cIn turn, a top Republican said Obama was ramming through an ill-conceived plan that will undermine the country’s economic future. The latest rhetorical volleys were traded as Democrats struggled to regain much-needed political momentum on the high-priority issue before the August congressional recess.\u201d <\/p>\n\n

A good chunk of the coverage, particularly in the talk-oriented media, portrayed the health care battle as a philosophical donnybrook between the forces of big government and big business. <\/p>\n\n

\u201cThis is an ideological fight for the country,\u201d declared liberal talk host Ed Schultz on his July 21 radio show. \u201cThis is the top two percent influencing the big medical, lining the pockets of the conservative Democrats.\u2019 <\/p>\n\n

That night on the Fox News Channel, right-leaning host Bill O\u2019Reilly asserted that \u201cPresident Obama will try to save his health care vision with a prime-time press conference. He will not succeed. Americans understand the essential force of this country is freedom, not big government micromanaging what we can and cannot do.\u201d <\/p>\n\n

The July 22 press conference quickly spawned coverage and commentary that often played out along sharply drawn political lines. <\/p>\n\n

[and]<\/p>\n\n\n

Jindal was followed by top Obama adviser David Axelrod, who countered that, \u201cMr. Jindal says \u2018well the government shouldn\u2019t interfere in the market.\u2019 The bottom line right now is everyone is at the mercy of the insurance industry and this would reform the system and put consumers in control.\u201d <\/p>\n\n

Explaining the complicated state of health care coverage, as well as the details of various ideas to reform it, can be a very daunting task for the media. Monitoring the spin wars between the two sides is far easier and helps explain why the subject has finally climbed to the top of the news agenda. <\/p>\n\n

The Gates Case <\/strong> <\/p>\n\n

The two sectors that devoted the most coverage to the flap over the arrest of \u201cSkip\u201d Gates were cable news (19%) and network news (15%). And perhaps that\u2019s fitting for a story that owes much of its prominence to a televised press conference. <\/p>\n\n

When Obama was asked, as the very end of last week\u2019s press event, what the Gates arrest said \u201cabout race relations in America,\u201d he acknowledged that Gates was \u201ca friend\u201d and \u201cI don\u2019t know all the facts.\u201d But he triggered an uproar by adding that \u201cthe Cambridge Police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home.\u201d <\/p>\n\n

The Cambridge police responded with a staunch defense of the officer in question, Sgt. James Crowley, with calls arising for the President to apologize to the law enforcement community. <\/p>\n\n

\u201cPresident Obama’s comments about the arrest of prominent Harvard University professor Henry Louis Gates<\/a> has added fuel to the story that has dominated national headlines and stirred discussion over race in America,\u201d said a story on the ABC News web site. And, as the piece noted, it \u201ccertainly has moved the focus of attention from health care to the Gates controversy.\u201d <\/p>\n\n

Some coverage examined the broader issues that emerged from the incident. A July 24 New York Times article cited a view among some that \u201cwhat happened to Professor Gates was a common, if unacknowledged, reality for many people of color\u2026. But more deeply, many said that the incident was a disappointing reminder that for all the racial progress the country seemed to have made with the election of President Obama, little had changed in the everyday lives of most people in terms of race relations.\u201d <\/p>\n\n

But much of the narrative pivoted to focus on Obama\u2019s remarks and their political consequences. <\/p>\n\n

[against Gates]<\/p>\n\n\n

Guest hosting for Keith Olbermann on MSNBC, Richard Wolffe opined that \u201cthe president\u2019s critics are doing all they can to prevent the controversy from going away. From Rush Limbaugh, two days of glee. He\u2019s been caricaturing the president as an angry black man\u2026\u201d <\/p>\n\n

By week\u2019s end, Obama amended his earlier remarks in an attempt to douse the raging controversy. \u201cThis has been ratcheting up, and I obviously helped to contribute ratcheting it up,” he acknowledged in a statement. “I want to make clear that in my choice of words, I think I unfortunately gave an impression that I was maligning the Cambridge Police Department or Sgt. Crowley specifically. And I could’ve calibrated those words differently.” <\/p>\n\n

A July 25 Associated Press story tried to put Obama\u2019s modified mea culpa in context. \u201cKnocked off stride by a racial uproar he helped stoke, President Barack Obama hastened Friday to tamp down the controversy,\u201d the article stated. \u201cHe personally telephoned both Gates and Sgt. James Crowley, hoping to end the rancorous back-and-forth over what had transpired and what Obama had said about it.\u201d <\/p>\n\n

If the administration had hoped to keep health care reform at the forefront of the national conversation, it was Gates-gate that was commanding the headlines at the end of the week. <\/p>\n\n

The Rest of the Week\u2019s News <\/strong> <\/p>\n\n

The second-biggest story from July 20-26 was the economic crisis, which at 12% of the newshole, was slightly down from 13% the previous week. (Once again, that subject was the lead story in the newspaper sector, accounting for 20% of the front-page coverage.) The top two storylines were the financial sector and the impact of the crisis on state and local governments. The big news in the banking world was a report projecting the government bailout could potentially cost as much as $24 trillion. Coverage of how states were handling the crisis included a video of California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger brandishing a knife as a symbol of budget cuts. <\/p>\n\n

The No. 4 story last week was the fighting in Afghanistan, with much of the focus on Bowe Bergdahl, the captured U.S. soldier who was displayed and featured in a Taliban video. The anniversary of Apollo 11 came next at 4%. \u00a0The almost wistful tone of the coverage was captured in this July 21 story in the San Jose Mercury News. <\/p>\n\n

\u201cWhile America paused to reminisce Monday about Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin’s first moon landing 40 years ago, a group of space veterans used unusually blunt language to express frustration at a nation that appears to have lost its exploratory compass in space,\u201d the story stated. \u201cSeven Apollo veterans\u2026told reporters that they have gone from a rock-solid faith that Americans would land on Mars by the end of the 20th century to dismay at a nation that appears to lack the spirit of exploration that powered the moon effort in the 1960s.\u201d <\/p>\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n

Lead Newsmakers\u00a0<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n

After a series of weeks in which he was supplanted as a top newsmaker by Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor and pop icon Michael Jackson, Barack Obama re-emerged in the headlines last week. As the figure at the center of both the health care and Gates controversies, he was a lead newsmaker in 18% of the stories from July 20-26.\u00a0 For his part, Gates was the week\u2019s No. 2 newsmaker at 5%. <\/p>\n\n

Next (at 2%) came captured U.S. soldier Bowe Bergdahl, followed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (also 2%), who traded unflattering remarks with the government of North Korea. The fifth-biggest newsmaker, at 1% was Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, who testified before Congress about the administration\u2019s plans to reform the financial sector. <\/p>\n\n

About the NCI<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n

PEJ\u2019s weekly News Coverage Index examines the news agenda of 55 different outlets from five sectors of the media: print, online, network TV, cable and radio. (See List of Outlets<\/a>.) The weekly study, which includes some 1,300 stories, is designed to provide news consumers, journalists and researchers with hard data about what stories and topics the media are covering, the trajectories of that media narrative and differences among news platforms. The percentages are based on “newshole,” or the space devoted to each subject in print and online and time on radio and TV. (See Our Methodology<\/a>.) In addition, these reports also include a rundown of the week\u2019s leading newsmakers, a designation given to people or institutions who account for at least 50% of a given story. <\/p>\n\n

Mark Jurkowitz of PEJ<\/em> <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

With the political battle over health care legislation intensifying in Washington, that subject generated its highest level of coverage, by far, last week. But a remark by the president at the end of his health care press conference quickly changed the news agenda.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sub_headline":"PEJ News Coverage Index July 20 - 26, 2009","sub_title":"PEJ News Coverage Index July 20 - 26, 2009","_crdt_document":"","_prc_public_revisions":[],"_ppp_expiration_hours":0,"_ppp_enabled":false,"ai_generated_summary":"","relatedPosts":[],"reportMaterials":[],"multiSectionReport":[],"package_parts__enabled":false,"package_parts":[],"_prc_fork_parent":0,"_prc_fork_status":"","_prc_active_fork":0,"datacite_doi":"","datacite_doi_citation":"","_prc_seo_qr_attachment_id":0,"spoken_article_player_enabled":true,"bylines":[],"acknowledgements":[],"displayBylines":true,"footnotes":"","prc_watchers":[]},"categories":[340],"tags":[],"bylines":[],"collection":[],"datasets":[],"level_of_effort":[],"primary_audience":[],"information_type":[],"_post_visibility":[],"formats":[458],"_fund_pool":[],"languages":[],"regions-countries":[],"research-teams":[527],"workflow-status":[],"class_list":["post-90175","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-presidents-press","formats-report","research-teams-journalism"],"label":false,"post_parent":0,"word_count":1943,"canonical_url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2009\/07\/27\/pej-news-coverage-index-july-20-26-2009\/","art_direction":false,"_embeds":[],"watchers":[],"table_of_contents":[],"report_materials":"","report_pagination":{"current_post":null,"next_post":null,"previous_post":null,"pagination_items":[]},"parent_info":{"parent_title":"From Health Care to \u201cSkip\u201d Gates, Obama Makes Big News","parent_id":90175},"materialsOrdered":[],"chaptersOrdered":[],"partsOrdered":[],"partsEnabled":false,"datacite_doi":"","prc_seo_data":{"title":"From Health Care to \u201cSkip\u201d Gates, Obama Makes Big News","description":" With the political battle over health care legislation intensifying in Washington, that subject generated its highest level of coverage, by far, last week. But a remark by the president at the end of his health care press conference quickly changed the news agenda.","og_title":"From Health Care to \u201cSkip\u201d Gates, Obama Makes Big News","og_description":" With the political battle over health care legislation intensifying in Washington, that subject generated its highest level of coverage, by far, last week. But a remark by the president at the end of his health care press conference quickly changed the news agenda.","schema_type":"Article","noindex":false,"canonical_url":"","primary_terms":[],"custom_schema":[],"og_image":0,"indexnow_submitted_at":null,"gsc_index_status":null},"prepublish_checks":{"prc-image-alt-text":{"status":"incomplete","message":"5 images are missing alt text.","data":{"count":5}},"prc-about-this-research":{"status":"incomplete","message":"Add an \"About this research\" details block.","data":null},"prc-paragraph-count":{"status":"complete","message":"Found 39 paragraphs.","data":{"count":39}},"prc-internal-link":{"status":"complete","message":"Found 2 internal links.","data":{"count":2}}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"relatedPostsOrdered":[],"bylinesOrdered":[],"acknowledgementsOrdered":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90175","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90175"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90175\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":130388,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90175\/revisions\/130388"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90175"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90175"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90175"},{"taxonomy":"bylines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/bylines?post=90175"},{"taxonomy":"collection","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collection?post=90175"},{"taxonomy":"datasets","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/datasets?post=90175"},{"taxonomy":"level_of_effort","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/level_of_effort?post=90175"},{"taxonomy":"primary_audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/primary_audience?post=90175"},{"taxonomy":"information_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/information_type?post=90175"},{"taxonomy":"_post_visibility","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_post_visibility?post=90175"},{"taxonomy":"formats","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/formats?post=90175"},{"taxonomy":"_fund_pool","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_fund_pool?post=90175"},{"taxonomy":"languages","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/languages?post=90175"},{"taxonomy":"regions-countries","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/regions-countries?post=90175"},{"taxonomy":"research-teams","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/research-teams?post=90175"},{"taxonomy":"workflow-status","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/workflow-status?post=90175"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}