![\"\"](\"https:\/\/assets.pewresearch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/13\/legacy\/u52\/OBL_by_Sector_0.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n death of Osama bin Laden was the biggest story measured in any single week since the Pew Research Center\u2019s Project for Excellence in Journalism began tracking mainstream media coverage in January 2007.<\/span><\/p>\n\n Coverage of the May 1 raid in Abbottabad, Pakistan, and its aftermath, accounted for 69% of the newshole during the week of May 2-8, according to PEJ\u2019s weekly News Coverage Index. That was enough to edged the media attention (measured at just under 69%) devoted to the presidential campaign from August 25-31, 2008, the week Democrats nominated Barack Obama at their Denver convention and John McCain introduced Sarah Palin as his surprise running mate.<\/span><\/p>\n\n On cable television alone, the bin Laden story accounted for a staggering 90% of the airtime studied last week.<\/span><\/p>\n\n In another illustration of the enormity of coverage, bin Laden was a dominant newsmaker in 28% of last week\u2019s stories, the most media attention devoted to anyone since the week of Barack Obama\u2019s inauguration, January 19-25, 2009.<\/span><\/p>\n\n Overall coverage of the story did taper somewhat throughout the week. On Monday, it accounted for 83% of the newshole. On Friday, it accounted for 40%. Yet even at its lowest level, the subject dominated all other news events. <\/span><\/p>\n\n The biggest bin Laden storyline from May 2-8 was piecing together the dramatic narrative of the mission to kill him, which accounted for 36% of all bin Laden coverage as new details\u2014and sometimes corrections to previous details\u2014continued to emerge throughout the week.<\/span><\/p>\n\n The second biggest storyline was coverage of the political implications of the event, at 15%. But that lagged well behind the narrative thread. Even on cable news, which focuses heavily on political and partisan issues, that thread accounted for only 13% of the airtime. The next biggest storyline overall was the role of Pakistan and its impact on U.S.-Pakistan relations, at 10%. Then came the implications for future terrorism and national security, at 7% of all bin Laden coverage.<\/span><\/p>\n\n Toward the end of the week, however, some aspects of the narrative began to change as the media explored new angles. On Friday, May 6, attention to the political implications of the killing accounted for over one-fifth of all bin Laden coverage. The numbers were about the same that day for Obama\u2019s visit to the World Trade Center as well as for coverage of the broader implications for the fight against terrorism. Those were some of the narratives that finally began to supplant the tick-tock recounting of events, which made up 16% of the coverage studied that day, down from 53% on Monday.<\/span><\/p>\n\n The impact and intensity of this story prompted PEJ to release a May 9 special report<\/a> on the early coverage of the death of bin Laden, using computer technology by Crimson Hexagon<\/a> that examined more than 120,000 news stories from May 1 through May 4. An updated analysis of Crimson Hexagon, incorporating the rest of the week, found little overall change in the mainstream media conversation about bin Laden. About a third of it focused on the events of the raid. Another quarter focused on the global reaction to the death. These and the other narratives comprising coverage of bin Laden\u2019s death largely tracked along with PEJ\u2019s NCI sample of outlets for the week. <\/span><\/p>\n\n All this wall-to-wall attention left little room for the media to focus on anything else last week. In fact, the No. 2 story, the U.S. economy, registered at 5% of the newshole, a whopping 64 percentage points behind the bin Laden saga. <\/span><\/p>\n\n The Death of Osama bin Laden<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n It was a \u201cwhere were you when\u2026\u201d piece of news, broken on Twitter, and interrupting cable and network broadcasts on the night of May 1. <\/span><\/p>\n\n And on Monday morning, May 2, every channel, screen and page delivered news about bin Laden\u2019s death. On ABC\u2019s Good Morning America, George Stephanopoulos narrated the intro over scenes of jubilation in New York and Washington: \u201cAfter a decade of anger, grief, vigilance and fear, the mastermind of 9-11 has been killed.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n\n Erica Hill, of the CBS Early Show, was standing at Ground Zero. \u201cWe are down here on the corner of Church and Vesey Streets, two names which probably ring very familiar for folks,\u201d she said. \u201cJust as we prepare to mark the tenth anniversary of 9-11, the news comes in, of course, that Osama bin Laden was killed in that daring raid in Pakistan.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n\n Meredith Vieira, on NBC\u2019s Today Show, opened the newscast with these simple words: \u201cGood morning, Osama bin Laden is dead.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n\n The<\/span><\/p>\n\n media\u2019s craving for details of the raid and the planning that went into it translated into detailed attention to the sequence of events, down to the menu in the Situation Room the evening of the mission\u2019s execution\u2014turkey pita wraps, cold shrimp, potato chips, soda.<\/span><\/p>\n\n On May 2, the New York Times published a 1,000-word story that included an account of the disposal of bin Laden\u2019s remains at sea: <\/span><\/p>\n\n \u201cThe body then was placed on a prepared flat board and eased into the sea. Only a small group of people watching from one of the large elevator platforms that move aircraft up to the flight deck were witness to the end of America\u2019s most wanted fugitive.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n\n The story contained one of the more widely circulated and reprinted images\u2014a White House photo of the president and his advisors, including Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, sitting in close quarters inside the Situation Room, staring intently at a screen. <\/span><\/p>\n\n Other storylines continued to remain secondary to the narrative, as journalists struggled to fill in the missing pieces of what happened in Abbottabad. This absorption with the narrative of events, however, was no doubt heightened by a White House version of the story that seemed to change with each day. <\/span><\/p>\n\n On May 2, the official administration version of events included a firefight between Navy Seals and bin Laden, who reportedly used his wife as a human shield. By the next day, the record had been changed to reflect that bin Laden had not fired a weapon nor used a human shield. And by Wednesday, the story was revised yet again as the administration said the raid was not a firefight, but in fact an operation that drew enemy fire only at the beginning by bin Laden\u2019s courier. <\/span><\/p>\n\n Even as the largest share of the week\u2019s coverage was devoted to figuring out the events of the bin Laden mission, other angles did work their way into the media coverage. <\/span><\/p>\n\n One of these was politics. As early as Monday evening, MSNBC Hardball host Chris Matthews asked, \u201cSo what\u2019s the impact politically? Does this news reshape the 2012 outlook?\u201d One of his guests, Major Garrett of National Journal, offered that the news might not trump concerns about the problems facing Americans on a day-to-day basis.<\/span><\/p>\n\n \u201cThe question for President Obama, as this great event plays out, is how much is the country going to be focused on national security, terrorism, as it regards to the 2012 election, as opposed to the economy, budget and the deficit,\u201d said Garrett. <\/span><\/p>\n\n At least in the hours after the initial news, though, Obama appeared to be riding a wave of increased support. Ann Compton of ABC News reported on a May 3 radio broadcast that \u201cPresident Obama is getting a significant bump up in the polls for his handling of his job and Afghanistan,\u201d as she cited a Washington Post\/Pew Research Center poll that showed Obama\u2019s overall approval rating up to 56%.<\/span><\/p>\n\n Some<\/span><\/p>\n\n news outlets turned to the question of what the raid\u2014conducted unilaterally\u2014would do to the already strained U.S. relationship with Pakistan. In an NPR interview, Senate Foreign Relations Committee chair John Kerry discussed the long history of concerns about Pakistan\u2019s failure to fully cooperate with the U.S. in the hunt for bin Laden. He added, however, a caveat. \u201cThey have permitted us to engage in a pretty robust campaign in the western part of their country with drones,\u201d Kerry said. \u201cA lot of civilians have been killed in their country by virtue of that. That makes their own politics very complicated. It\u2019s not been without a price paid on their part too.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n\n Other outlets raised the issue of what bin Laden\u2019s demise could mean for the risk of terrorist reprisal in the U.S. An ABC World News Tonight report on May 3 illustrated those concerns with a family on vacation. \u201cThe Space Needle in Seattle today,\u201d narrated Jim Avila. \u201cPlenty of tourists, but the Eagle family from Forth Worth, Texas, did have to calm their son\u2019s fear before the trip.\u201d Most of the experts interviewed, however, suggested that ordinary Americans had little to worry about. <\/span><\/p>\n\n Still other stories followed the debate over whether the White House would\u2014or should\u2014release photos of the deceased bin Laden, a move that President Obama ultimately vetoed, arguing that they could provoke a backlash from bin Laden supporters around the world. That decision was characterized by the Washington Post in a May 5 article as an indication of some tensions within the administration; \u201cThe move appeared to contradict CIA Director Leon Panetta\u2019s assertion Tuesday that the photos would eventually be made public, suggesting a split among the president\u2019s top aides.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n\n By Sunday, May 8, a week after the raid, the bin Laden story was still a fixture on the nation\u2019s front pages. In the Washington Post, two front page stories were devoted to the subject\u2014one on seized footage of the al-Qaeda chief, the other on the future leadership of his terrorist organization. The New York Times ran with a story about bin Laden\u2019s life in hiding. And the Los Angeles Times front page contained a story on what the bin Laden raid tells us about the increased sophistication of the CIA.<\/span><\/p>\n\n The Rest of the Week\u2019s News<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n Crowded out by the news about Osama bin Laden, the rest of the top stories almost seemed like an afterthought last week. The U.S. economy was a distant No. 2 story, at 5% of the newshole, largely due to encouraging employment statistics from the month of April. Flooding in the South and Midwest accounted for the No. 3 story, at 3% of the newshole. Also at 3% was the U.S. presidential election, with coverage driven largely by the first Republican debate in Greenville, South Carolina. Finally, the No. 5 story of the week (2%) revolved around education in the U.S. as various outlets reported on school systems struggling under the weight of layoffs, budget cuts, and inadequate student assessment policies. <\/span><\/p>\n\n Newsmakers of the Week<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n Few<\/span><\/p>\n\n weeks in the history of PEJ\u2019s News Coverage Index have been so singularly focused on one person as last week. Osama bin Laden was a dominant newsmaker in 28% of all stories studied\u2014a level not seen since President Obama\u2019s inauguration more than two years earlier. (To be considered a dominant newsmaker, someone must be featured in at least 50% of a story.)<\/span><\/p>\n\n Indeed, all the week\u2019s top newsmakers were central figures in the bid Laden story. Obama himself was the focus of 17% of all stories, a sizeable number in and of itself. (The previous week, Obama was a dominant newsmaker in 10% of the stories). There was a major drop-off to the next tier of newsmakers which included Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (1%), White House counterterrorism advisor John Brennan (1%), and CIA director Leon Panetta (1%). <\/span><\/p>\n\n About the NCI<\/strong> <\/span><\/p>\n\n PEJ\u2019s weekly News Coverage Index examines the news agenda of 52 different outlets from five sectors of the media: print, online, network TV, cable and radio. (See List of Outlets<\/a>.) The weekly study, which includes some 1,000 stories, is designed to provide news consumers, journalists and researchers with hard data about what stories and topics the media are covering, the trajectories of that media narrative and differences among news platforms. The percentages are based on “newshole,” or the space devoted to each subject in print and online and time on radio and TV. (See Our Methodology<\/a>.) In addition, these reports also include a rundown of the week\u2019s leading newsmakers, a designation given to people who account for at least 50% of a given story. <\/span><\/p>\n\n Jesse Holcomb of PEJ<\/span><\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The killing of Osama bin Laden accounted for more than two-thirds of all news coverage last week as the media spent much of it trying to piece together exactly what happened in that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. And that proved to be an ever-changing and evolving narrative.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sub_headline":"PEJ News Coverage Index May 2-8, 2011","sub_title":"PEJ News Coverage Index May 2-8, 2011","_prc_public_revisions":[],"_ppp_expiration_hours":0,"_ppp_enabled":false,"ai_generated_summary":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"apple_news_api_id":"","apple_news_api_revision":"","apple_news_api_created_at":"","apple_news_api_modified_at":"","apple_news_api_share_url":"","apple_news_api_pending":"","apple_news_is_preview":false,"apple_news_is_hidden":false,"relatedPosts":[],"reportMaterials":[],"multiSectionReport":[],"package_parts__enabled":false,"package_parts":[],"datacite_doi":"","datacite_doi_citation":"","_prc_seo_qr_attachment_id":0,"spoken_article_player_enabled":true,"displayBylines":true,"footnotes":"","prc_watchers":[],"_prc_fork_parent":0,"_prc_fork_status":"","_prc_active_fork":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[],"tags":[],"bylines":[],"collection":[],"datasets":[],"level_of_effort":[],"primary_audience":[],"information_type":[],"_post_visibility":[],"formats":[458],"_fund_pool":[],"languages":[],"regions-countries":[],"research-teams":[527],"workflow-status":[],"class_list":["post-89525","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","formats-report","research-teams-journalism"],"label":false,"post_parent":0,"word_count":2022,"canonical_url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2011\/05\/08\/pej-news-coverage-index-may-2-8-2011\/","art_direction":false,"_embeds":[],"watchers":[],"table_of_contents":[],"report_materials":"","report_pagination":{"current_post":null,"next_post":null,"previous_post":null,"pagination_items":[]},"parent_info":{"parent_title":"Osama bin Laden\u2019s Death Continues to Dominate the News","parent_id":89525},"materialsOrdered":[],"chaptersOrdered":[],"partsOrdered":[],"partsEnabled":false,"datacite_doi":"","prc_seo_data":{"title":"Osama bin Laden\u2019s Death Continues to Dominate the News","description":"The killing of Osama bin Laden accounted for more than two-thirds of all news coverage last week as the media spent much of it trying to piece together exactly what happened in that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. And that proved to be an ever-changing and evolving narrative.","og_title":"Osama bin Laden\u2019s Death Continues to Dominate the News","og_description":"The killing of Osama bin Laden accounted for more than two-thirds of all news coverage last week as the media spent much of it trying to piece together exactly what happened in that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. And that proved to be an ever-changing and evolving narrative.","schema_type":"Article","noindex":false,"canonical_url":"","primary_terms":[],"custom_schema":[],"og_image":0,"indexnow_submitted_at":null,"gsc_index_status":null},"prepublish_checks":{"prc-image-alt-text":{"status":"incomplete","message":"4 images are missing alt text.","data":{"count":4}},"prc-about-this-research":{"status":"incomplete","message":"Add an \"About this research\" details block.","data":null},"prc-paragraph-count":{"status":"complete","message":"Found 41 paragraphs.","data":{"count":41}},"prc-internal-link":{"status":"complete","message":"Found 3 internal links.","data":{"count":3}}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"relatedPostsOrdered":[],"bylinesOrdered":[],"acknowledgementsOrdered":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89525"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89525\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":129976,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89525\/revisions\/129976"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89525"},{"taxonomy":"bylines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/bylines?post=89525"},{"taxonomy":"collection","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collection?post=89525"},{"taxonomy":"datasets","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/datasets?post=89525"},{"taxonomy":"level_of_effort","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/level_of_effort?post=89525"},{"taxonomy":"primary_audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/primary_audience?post=89525"},{"taxonomy":"information_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/information_type?post=89525"},{"taxonomy":"_post_visibility","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_post_visibility?post=89525"},{"taxonomy":"formats","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/formats?post=89525"},{"taxonomy":"_fund_pool","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_fund_pool?post=89525"},{"taxonomy":"languages","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/languages?post=89525"},{"taxonomy":"regions-countries","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/regions-countries?post=89525"},{"taxonomy":"research-teams","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/research-teams?post=89525"},{"taxonomy":"workflow-status","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/workflow-status?post=89525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"\"](\"https:\/\/assets.pewresearch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/13\/legacy\/u52\/Top_OBL_Themes_1.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/assets.pewresearch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/13\/legacy\/u52\/LOTW_18.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/assets.pewresearch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/13\/legacy\/u52\/Leads_26.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n