{"id":87731,"date":"2020-09-16T14:56:31","date_gmt":"2020-09-16T19:56:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/2020\/09\/16\/attention-to-candidates-increases-but-what-americans-know-and-think-about-them-diverges-by-party-media-sources\/"},"modified":"2024-08-13T10:32:16","modified_gmt":"2024-08-13T14:32:16","slug":"attention-to-candidates-increases-but-what-americans-know-and-think-about-them-diverges-by-party-media-sources","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/attention-to-candidates-increases-but-what-americans-know-and-think-about-them-diverges-by-party-media-sources\/","title":{"rendered":"2. Attention to candidates increases, but what Americans know and think about them diverges by party, media sources"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

With the national nominating conventions concluded and the election cycle entering its closing stretch, Americans are now following news about the presidential candidates more closely than they were a few months ago. And while there are virtually no partisan differences in how closely Americans are following the election, there are some distinctions within parties depending on where people get their political news.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Americans\u2019<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Overall, 66% of U.S. adults now say they are following news about the candidates very closely (30%) or fairly closely (35%). When surveyed in early June, 54% of Americans were following candidate news very closely (21%) or fairly closely (32%), and in April, about half (52%) were doing so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Throughout this election year, news about the presidential candidates has competed with several mega-stories, in particular the coronavirus pandemic and the ongoing protests over social justice that were triggered by the killing of George Floyd in late May. In June, for example, about half of Americans (54%) were following election news very or fairly closely, while 84% said they were doing so for news about the protests and 86% for news about the COVID-19 outbreak.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As of early September, members of both major political parties show very similar levels of interest in news about the candidates. Among Republicans and independents who lean Republican, 30% say they are following that news very closely, with 38% following it fairly closely. Among Democrats and independents who lean Democratic, 33% are following candidate news very closely, with 34% following it fairly closely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But within the parties themselves, there are differences in how closely people are following news about the candidates based on the major sources they use for political and election news.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In this analysis, there are four media-usage groups among Republicans (including leaners): those who only<\/em> indicated Fox News and\/or talk radio shows like Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh as major news sources for political and election news (these are the two sources among the eight whose audiences lean to the right politically); those who cited Fox News and\/or talk radio as well as at least one of the other six news sources asked about; those who did not cite Fox News or talk radio as a major source but selected at least one of the others as major sources; and those who said that none of the eight providers mentioned in the survey are major sources of political news for them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There also are four groups among Democrats (including leaners): those who cited only CNN, MSNBC, NPR, The New York Times and\/or the Washington Post as a major news source (these are the five providers whose audiences lean left politically); those who cited one of the five as well as any of the others; those who did not cite any of the five but did cite at least one other; and those who did not cite any of the eight as major sources of political news. (For more details on how the news outlets were classified and the categories of news consumers, see the appendix<\/a>.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Little<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Among those Republicans (and leaners) whose major sources for political news only include Fox News or talk radio shows like Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh, more than half (55%) say they are following news about the candidates very closely. That compares with 40% of Republicans whose major sources include a mix of Fox News or talk radio plus other outlets. And among Republicans whose major sources for political or election news are a mix of sources that does not include Fox News or talk radio, the percentage following news about the presidential candidates very closely drops to 16%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents whose major sources are only outlets with left-leaning audiences \u2013 CNN, MSNBC, NPR, The New York Times and The Washington Post \u2013 43% say they are following election news very closely. But attention levels are similar (44%) among those Democrats whose major political news sources include a mix of these sources and other sources asked about. And the proportion paying very close attention falls to 24% among Democrats who cite only major sources other than the outlets with left-leaning audiences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Major partisan gaps on questions about Trump\u2019s election powers and Biden\u2019s police position<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Several questions designed to track Americans\u2019 knowledge about the election and candidates revealed significant partisan gaps between Democrats and Republicans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Citing safety and fairness issues connected with voting during a national pandemic, Trump publicly mused about the idea<\/a> of delaying the Nov. 3 election \u2013 an authority the president does not hold<\/a>. Asked whether he has the authority to do that, Democrats and Republicans offer markedly different responses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Most<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

About two-thirds of all adults (66%) correctly say that the president does not have that authority, with only 10% saying he does \u2013 and the remaining 24% say they are unsure. But only about half of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents (49%) say the president cannot delay elections, while 16% say he can and about one-third (35%) say they are not sure. An overwhelming majority of Democrats and Democratic leaners (82%) say he cannot delay the election, with only 4% saying he can.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For the most part, there are few differences in responses to this question by media diet within parties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Republicans<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

A second question about Joe Biden\u2019s position on what has become a significant and heated campaign issue<\/a> not only produces wide partisan divergence but also highlights differences within parties depending on the news sources being used.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While Donald Trump and his campaign have accused Biden of wanting to defund the police<\/a>, a position supported by some activists<\/a>, the Democratic nominee has stated that he does not support defunding the police<\/a>, but would consider redirecting some police funds to services like mental health counseling<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Among all Americans, 35% correctly respond that Biden has not voiced support for defunding the police, while 27% say he has. Another 37% say they are not sure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Democrats are far more likely to say Biden has not voiced support for defunding the police (52%) than Republicans (18%). On the other hand, 45% of Republicans say that Biden has voiced support for defunding police, versus just 11% of Democrats who say the same. About a third in each party (36% of both parties) say they are not sure about Biden\u2019s position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Knowledge<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

On this question, there are large differences among Republicans with different media diets. About two-thirds (66%) of those who only named Fox News or talk radio as their major sources of political news say Biden voiced support for defunding the police, far more than the 48% in the group that uses a mix of Fox News, talk radio and other outlets asked about, and the 27% in the group that relies on major sources other than Fox News or talk radio who provide the same answer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Among Democrats, regardless of media usage, only between 8% and 16% say Biden voiced support for defunding police. But while 71% of Democrats whose main sources include only left-leaning outlets say he has not publicly supported this, along with 51% of Democrats who get their news from sources with left-leaning audiences and other sources, fewer than half (43%) of Democrats who use no sources with left-leaning audiences give that answer. In that group, 44% say they are not sure whether Biden has supported it or not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Democrats and Republicans about equally aware of Harris\u2019 resum\u00e9 but hold very different perceptions about her ideology<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\"At<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Although she had competed earlier in the crowded 2020 Democratic presidential contest, Sen. Kamala Harris was reintroduced to the nation when Biden announced her selection as his running mate six days before the party\u2019s convention. At the convention, Harris devoted part of her speech to her personal history and story<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A question about Harris\u2019 resum\u00e9 produced similar responses from Democrats and Republicans, but one that asked about views of her ideology highlighted varying partisan perceptions as well as differences by media sources.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Among all Americans, 52% correctly answered that Harris had been the California attorney general before being elected to the Senate, with similar portions of Republicans (51%) and Democrats (56%) responding correctly. Still, a substantial minority of both parties \u2013 41% of Republicans and 34% of Democrats \u2013 are not sure of the answer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When asked to characterize Harris\u2019 political views, 43% of all adults say she is either very liberal (25%) or mostly liberal (18%), while 25% say they are not sure. But when broken out by party, Republicans are more than 10 times as likely as Democrats to describe her as very liberal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Republicans<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Among Republicans, two-thirds (67%) characterize her views as very liberal (52%) or mostly liberal (16%). In stark contrast, only 24% of Democrats say she is very or mostly liberal (4% say Harris\u2019 views are very liberal, with another 20% saying they are mostly liberal). Instead, 19% of Democrats say she is slightly liberal, 22% say she is moderate and 11% say she is conservative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Among those Republicans who only use Fox News or talk radio as a major source, a full 83% say her views are very liberal. That number is nearly halved (44%) among Republicans who also get news from other sources, and it falls to 24% among Republicans whose major sources do not include either Fox News or talk radio, slightly behind the percentage who are not sure about her views (29%).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Among<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The percentage of Democrats within each of the four media diets who say Harris is very liberal is in the single digits. About six-in-ten of those whose major sources have only left-leaning audiences say she is very, mostly or slightly liberal (59%) \u2013 higher than Democrats in other groups who say the same (39% or fewer do). And for Democrats whose major sources do not include any in the left-leaning audience group, a plurality are not sure about her ideology (37%).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Americans about three times as likely to have followed own party\u2019s political convention than the other party\u2019s event<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\"Republicans<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

This year\u2019s national nominating conventions, held during the last two weeks in August, had to be reinvented as COVID-19 forced many events to be held virtually or as a hybrid of in-person and virtual staging<\/a>. Gone was much of the pomp and circumstance, as well as some of the audience that traditionally tunes in to these events<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Among all adults, there was very little difference in the attention paid to the two 2020 conventions. The percentage of Americans who followed the Democratic convention very closely (13%) was virtually the same as the percentage who followed the Republican convention very closely (12%). And majorities say they followed those events not too closely or not at all closely \u2013 62% for the Democratic convention and 63% for the Republican event.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

People were much more likely to follow their party\u2019s political convention more closely than the other party\u2019s convention. While 21% of Democrats say they followed their convention very closely and another 29% followed it fairly closely, only 6% of Republicans say they followed the Democratic event very closely, with another 20% following it fairly closely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conversely, the percentage of Republicans who followed the GOP convention very closely (19%) was also higher than the percentage of Democrats who did (7%). In addition, another 30% of Republicans followed their convention fairly closely, compared with 20% of Democrats.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Put simply, Democrats were about twice as likely as Republicans to follow the Democratic convention very or fairly closely (50% to 26%), and Republicans, by almost the same margin, were more likely than Democrats to follow the GOP convention very or fairly closely (49% to 27%).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Large party gaps in the assessment of campaign media coverage, and among Republicans, big differences by media diet<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\"Partisan<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Overall, the media seem to get passing grades when it comes to covering the general election. But as previous research has shown with evaluations of media performance<\/a>, Republicans offer a much more critical assessment than Democrats. And among Republicans, those whose main election sources include only talk radio or Fox News gave the media far lower grades than fellow party members with different media diets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Among all Americans, 12% say the media have done very well covering the election, with a solid plurality (46%) saying they have done somewhat well. Another 41% say they have done not too well (27%) or not at all well (14%).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Democrats and independents who lean Democratic offer a generally positive overall assessment, with about three-quarters (76%) saying the media have done either very well (18%) or somewhat well (58%) in covering the election. But only half as many Republicans and Republican leaners (38%) say the media have done very well (5%) or somewhat well (34%). And about six-in-ten Republicans (61%) say news organizations have either not done too well (36%) or not done at all well (24%) in chronicling the 2020 elections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Assessments<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Republican views of the media\u2019s work on the election differ substantially depending on their major sources for political and election news. Of those whose major sources only include Fox News or talk radio, three-in-ten say news organizations are doing their job very well (3%) or somewhat well (26%). That number climbs to about half (51%) of the Republicans who use Fox News or talk radio as well as other outlets as major sources of news \u2013 with 14% saying the media have done very well and 37% saying they have done somewhat well. And more Republicans who only have major sources other than Fox News or talk radio say journalists have done very well (9%) or somewhat well (53%) covering the election.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In contrast, there is less variation in Democrats\u2019 view of media performance based on news diets \u2013 about eight-in-ten of the Democrats who use any of the sources asked about as a major source say the news media are doing at least somewhat well. Indeed, 82% of Democrats whose major sources included only outlets with left-leaning audiences say the media have done very well (17%) or somewhat well (64%). Among those whose sources include the left-leaning audience outlets and others, the percentage saying the media have done very well is higher (32%), with 51% saying the media have done somewhat well \u2013 for a total of 83%. And 82% of those Democrats who only have major sources outside of the left-leaning group say the media have done very well (17%) or somewhat well (65%). The exception here is the group of Democrats who don\u2019t use any of the sources asked about, 57% of whom say the media are doing very or somewhat well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Among Democrats and Democratic leaners, those who cite the Biden campaign as a major source for political and election news are far more likely to give the media positive reviews of their election coverage. Four-in-ten of those Democrats who say the Biden campaign is a major source say that the media have done very well covering the presidential election, compared with just 12% of other Democrats. Among Republicans (including leaners), ratings of the news media\u2019s election coverage are relatively low, regardless of whether they say the Trump campaign is a major news source or not.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

With the national nominating conventions concluded and the election cycle entering its closing stretch, Americans are now following news about the presidential candidates more closely than they were a few months ago. And while there are virtually no partisan differences in how closely Americans are following the election, there are some distinctions within parties depending […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":377,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crdt_document":"","sub_headline":"","sub_title":"","_prc_public_revisions":[],"_ppp_expiration_hours":0,"_ppp_enabled":false,"ai_generated_summary":"","bylines":[],"acknowledgements":[],"displayBylines":true,"relatedPosts":[],"reportMaterials":[],"multiSectionReport":[],"package_parts__enabled":false,"package_parts":[],"_prc_fork_parent":0,"_prc_fork_status":"","_prc_active_fork":0,"datacite_doi":"","datacite_doi_citation":"","_prc_seo_qr_attachment_id":0,"spoken_article_player_enabled":true,"footnotes":""},"categories":[52,2394,329],"tags":[],"bylines":[987,848,896,889],"collection":[],"datasets":[],"level_of_effort":[],"primary_audience":[],"information_type":[],"_post_visibility":[],"formats":[458],"_fund_pool":[],"languages":[],"regions-countries":[],"research-teams":[527],"class_list":["post-87731","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-election-news-2","category-kamala-harris","category-misinformation","bylines-amy-mitchell","bylines-elisa-shearer","bylines-baxter-oliphant","bylines-mark-jurkowitz","formats-report","research-teams-journalism"],"label":false,"post_parent":87751,"word_count":2388,"canonical_url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/attention-to-candidates-increases-but-what-americans-know-and-think-about-them-diverges-by-party-media-sources\/","art_direction":{"A1":{"id":108468,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2020\/09\/PJ_2020.09.16_election-knowledge-misinformation_featured-jpg.webp","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2020\/09\/PJ_2020.09.16_election-knowledge-misinformation_featured-jpg.webp?w=564&h=317&crop=1","width":564,"height":317,"chartArt":false},"A2":{"id":108468,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2020\/09\/PJ_2020.09.16_election-knowledge-misinformation_featured-jpg.webp","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2020\/09\/PJ_2020.09.16_election-knowledge-misinformation_featured-jpg.webp?w=268&h=151&crop=1","width":268,"height":151,"chartArt":false},"A3":{"id":108468,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2020\/09\/PJ_2020.09.16_election-knowledge-misinformation_featured-jpg.webp","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2020\/09\/PJ_2020.09.16_election-knowledge-misinformation_featured-jpg.webp?w=194&h=110&crop=1","width":194,"height":110,"chartArt":false},"A4":{"id":108468,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2020\/09\/PJ_2020.09.16_election-knowledge-misinformation_featured-jpg.webp","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2020\/09\/PJ_2020.09.16_election-knowledge-misinformation_featured-jpg.webp?w=268&h=151&crop=1","width":268,"height":151,"chartArt":false},"XL":{"id":108468,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2020\/09\/PJ_2020.09.16_election-knowledge-misinformation_featured-jpg.webp","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2020\/09\/PJ_2020.09.16_election-knowledge-misinformation_featured-jpg.webp?w=720&h=405&crop=1","width":720,"height":405,"chartArt":false},"social":{"id":108468,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2020\/09\/PJ_2020.09.16_election-knowledge-misinformation_featured-jpg.webp","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2020\/09\/PJ_2020.09.16_election-knowledge-misinformation_featured-jpg.webp?w=1200&h=628&crop=1","width":1200,"height":628,"chartArt":false}},"_embeds":[],"table_of_contents":[{"id":87751,"title":"Political Divides, Conspiracy Theories and Divergent News Sources Heading Into 2020 Election","slug":"political-divides-conspiracy-theories-and-divergent-news-sources-heading-into-2020-election","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/political-divides-conspiracy-theories-and-divergent-news-sources-heading-into-2020-election\/","is_active":false},{"id":87740,"title":"1. Legitimacy of voting by mail politicized, leaving Americans divided","slug":"legitimacy-of-voting-by-mail-politicized-leaving-americans-divided","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/legitimacy-of-voting-by-mail-politicized-leaving-americans-divided\/","is_active":false},{"id":87731,"title":"2. Attention to candidates increases, but what Americans know and think about them diverges by party, media sources","slug":"attention-to-candidates-increases-but-what-americans-know-and-think-about-them-diverges-by-party-media-sources","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/attention-to-candidates-increases-but-what-americans-know-and-think-about-them-diverges-by-party-media-sources\/","is_active":true},{"id":87724,"title":"3. Most Americans who have heard of QAnon conspiracy theories say they are bad for the country and that Trump seems to support people who promote them","slug":"most-americans-who-have-heard-of-qanon-conspiracy-theories-say-they-are-bad-for-the-country-and-that-trump-seems-to-support-people-who-promote-them","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/most-americans-who-have-heard-of-qanon-conspiracy-theories-say-they-are-bad-for-the-country-and-that-trump-seems-to-support-people-who-promote-them\/","is_active":false},{"id":87717,"title":"Appendix: Grouping respondents by major news sources","slug":"appendix-grouping-respondents-by-major-news-sources","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/appendix-grouping-respondents-by-major-news-sources\/","is_active":false},{"id":87710,"title":"Acknowledgments","slug":"election-news-knowledge-misinformation-acknowledgments","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/election-news-knowledge-misinformation-acknowledgments\/","is_active":false},{"id":87702,"title":"Methodology","slug":"election-news-knowledge-misinformation-methodology","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/election-news-knowledge-misinformation-methodology\/","is_active":false}],"report_materials":[{"key":"e41c2b17-2e51-4a48-bd09-a69993d21687","type":"report","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2020\/09\/PJ_2020.09.16_Election-News-Knowledge-Misinformation_FINAL.pdf","label":"","icon":"","attachmentId":108494},{"key":"67836a6d-15a0-4820-aa07-c5ba4e65b099","type":"topline","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2020\/09\/PP_2020.09.16_Election-News-Knowledge-Misinformation_TOPLINE.pdf","label":"","icon":"","attachmentId":108435}],"report_pagination":{"current_post":{"id":87731,"title":"2. Attention to candidates increases, but what Americans know and think about them diverges by party, media sources","slug":"attention-to-candidates-increases-but-what-americans-know-and-think-about-them-diverges-by-party-media-sources","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/attention-to-candidates-increases-but-what-americans-know-and-think-about-them-diverges-by-party-media-sources\/","is_active":true,"page_num":3},"next_post":{"id":87724,"title":"3. Most Americans who have heard of QAnon conspiracy theories say they are bad for the country and that Trump seems to support people who promote them","slug":"most-americans-who-have-heard-of-qanon-conspiracy-theories-say-they-are-bad-for-the-country-and-that-trump-seems-to-support-people-who-promote-them","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/most-americans-who-have-heard-of-qanon-conspiracy-theories-say-they-are-bad-for-the-country-and-that-trump-seems-to-support-people-who-promote-them\/","is_active":false,"page_num":4},"previous_post":{"id":87740,"title":"1. Legitimacy of voting by mail politicized, leaving Americans divided","slug":"legitimacy-of-voting-by-mail-politicized-leaving-americans-divided","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/legitimacy-of-voting-by-mail-politicized-leaving-americans-divided\/","is_active":false,"page_num":2},"pagination_items":[{"id":87751,"title":"Political Divides, Conspiracy Theories and Divergent News Sources Heading Into 2020 Election","slug":"political-divides-conspiracy-theories-and-divergent-news-sources-heading-into-2020-election","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/political-divides-conspiracy-theories-and-divergent-news-sources-heading-into-2020-election\/","is_active":false,"page_num":1},{"id":87740,"title":"1. Legitimacy of voting by mail politicized, leaving Americans divided","slug":"legitimacy-of-voting-by-mail-politicized-leaving-americans-divided","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/legitimacy-of-voting-by-mail-politicized-leaving-americans-divided\/","is_active":false,"page_num":2},{"id":87731,"title":"2. Attention to candidates increases, but what Americans know and think about them diverges by party, media sources","slug":"attention-to-candidates-increases-but-what-americans-know-and-think-about-them-diverges-by-party-media-sources","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/attention-to-candidates-increases-but-what-americans-know-and-think-about-them-diverges-by-party-media-sources\/","is_active":true,"page_num":3},{"id":87724,"title":"3. Most Americans who have heard of QAnon conspiracy theories say they are bad for the country and that Trump seems to support people who promote them","slug":"most-americans-who-have-heard-of-qanon-conspiracy-theories-say-they-are-bad-for-the-country-and-that-trump-seems-to-support-people-who-promote-them","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/most-americans-who-have-heard-of-qanon-conspiracy-theories-say-they-are-bad-for-the-country-and-that-trump-seems-to-support-people-who-promote-them\/","is_active":false,"page_num":4},{"id":87717,"title":"Appendix: Grouping respondents by major news sources","slug":"appendix-grouping-respondents-by-major-news-sources","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/appendix-grouping-respondents-by-major-news-sources\/","is_active":false,"page_num":5},{"id":87710,"title":"Acknowledgments","slug":"election-news-knowledge-misinformation-acknowledgments","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/election-news-knowledge-misinformation-acknowledgments\/","is_active":false,"page_num":6},{"id":87702,"title":"Methodology","slug":"election-news-knowledge-misinformation-methodology","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/journalism\/2020\/09\/16\/election-news-knowledge-misinformation-methodology\/","is_active":false,"page_num":7}]},"parent_info":{"parent_title":"Political Divides, Conspiracy Theories and Divergent News Sources Heading Into 2020 Election","parent_id":87751},"materialsOrdered":[],"chaptersOrdered":[],"partsOrdered":[],"partsEnabled":false,"datacite_doi":"","prc_seo_data":{"title":"Attention to candidates increases, but what Americans know and think about them diverges by party, media sources","description":"With the national nominating conventions concluded and the election cycle entering its closing stretch, Americans are now following news about the presidential candidates more closely than they were a few…","og_title":"Attention to candidates increases, but what Americans know and think about them diverges by party, media sources","og_description":"With the national nominating conventions concluded and the election cycle entering its closing stretch, Americans are now following news about the presidential candidates more closely than they were a few…","schema_type":"Article","noindex":false,"canonical_url":"","primary_terms":{"category":52,"research-teams":527},"custom_schema":[],"og_image":108468,"indexnow_submitted_at":null,"gsc_index_status":null},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"relatedPostsOrdered":[],"bylinesOrdered":[],"acknowledgementsOrdered":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87731","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/377"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87731"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87731\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":183312,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87731\/revisions\/183312"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87731"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87731"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87731"},{"taxonomy":"bylines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/bylines?post=87731"},{"taxonomy":"collection","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collection?post=87731"},{"taxonomy":"datasets","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/datasets?post=87731"},{"taxonomy":"level_of_effort","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/level_of_effort?post=87731"},{"taxonomy":"primary_audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/primary_audience?post=87731"},{"taxonomy":"information_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/information_type?post=87731"},{"taxonomy":"_post_visibility","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_post_visibility?post=87731"},{"taxonomy":"formats","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/formats?post=87731"},{"taxonomy":"_fund_pool","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_fund_pool?post=87731"},{"taxonomy":"languages","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/languages?post=87731"},{"taxonomy":"regions-countries","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/regions-countries?post=87731"},{"taxonomy":"research-teams","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/research-teams?post=87731"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}