{"id":74601,"date":"2007-10-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-10-24T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance3\/"},"modified":"2024-04-14T04:13:56","modified_gmt":"2024-04-14T09:13:56","slug":"a-delicate-balance3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance3\/","title":{"rendered":"Glimmers of Change"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 id=\"the-cantwell-decision-and-the-jehovahs-witnesses-cases\" class=\"wp-block-heading\" style=\"font-size:14px\">The <em><span style=\"font-size: 14px;font-weight: bold\">Cantwell<\/span><\/em> Decision and the Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses Cases<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The most important of these pre-Warren rulings was handed down in <a title=\"Cantwell v. Connecticut\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/1901-1939\/1939\/1939_632\"><em>Cantwell v. Connecticut<\/em><\/a> (1940). In this decision, the court held that the Free Exercise Clause applied to the states on the grounds that religious freedom is part of the 14th Amendment\u2019s Due Process Clause, which protects \u201clife, liberty and property\u201d against arbitrary interference by the states. Until <em>Cantwell<\/em>, the Free Exercise Clause had regulated only the actions of the federal government and did not in any way apply to state laws or actions regarding religion.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the end, however, <em>Cantwell\u2019s<\/em> potential impact on religious freedom was tempered by the fact that the case was ultimately more about freedom of speech than the free exercise of religion. Jesse Cantwell had been convicted of disturbing the peace after he played an anti-Catholic record on a street corner in New Haven, Conn. The court overturned his conviction, but the decision emphasized Cantwell\u2019s First Amendment right to free speech as well as religious liberty. Thus, <em>Cantwell<\/em> implicitly reaffirmed the core principle of <em>Reynolds<\/em> and <em>Davis<\/em> that the Free Exercise Clause affords no special exemption for religious actions that contravene the law.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Around the same time that <em>Cantwell<\/em> was decided, the court issued two related rulings that further affirmed the interpretation of the Free Exercise Clause spelled out in <em>Reynolds<\/em> and <em>Davis<\/em>. In <a title=\"Minersville School District v. Gobitis\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/1901-1939\/1939\/1939_690\"><em>Minersville School District v. Gobitis<\/em><\/a> (1940), the court ruled that the clause did not give religiously motivated public school children, who in this case were Jehovah\u2019s Witnesses, the right to opt out of a compulsory flag-salute ceremony. The <em>Gobitis<\/em> decision led to reports that Jehovah\u2019s Witnesses were being threatened and even physically assaulted for refusing to salute the flag.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Just three years later, the court took up a virtually identical case, once again involving the refusal of Jehovah\u2019s Witnesses to salute the flag. This time, though, the result was quite different. In <a title=\"West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/1940-1949\/1942\/1942_591\"><em>West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette<\/em><\/a> (1943), the court overruled <em>Gobitis<\/em> and recognized students\u2019 right not to participate in such a ceremony. But like the <em>Cantwell<\/em> decision, the ruling in <em>Barnette<\/em> still did not recognize a religion-based right to special treatment. Instead, the court again based the decision on the right of free speech, concluding that the school board had no power to compel any student, regardless of the reasons for the student\u2019s resistance, to participate in a ritual of patriotism.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Thus the <em>Barnette<\/em> case did not alter the court\u2019s general rule on the Free Exercise Clause that had been laid out in <em>Reynolds<\/em> and subsequent decisions. Indeed, shortly after <em>Barnette<\/em>, the court further affirmed the same principle in <em><a title=\"Prince v. Massachusetts\" href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/supct\/html\/historics\/USSC_CR_0321_0158_ZO.html\">Prince v. Massachusetts<\/a><\/em> (1944). In that case, it held that the Free Exercise Clause did not exempt a member of the Jehovah\u2019s Witnesses from child labor laws even though the child was selling religious materials as a matter of religious duty.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, the same year as the <em>Prince<\/em> ruling, the court handed down another decision that affirmed the other, more religion-friendly side of the <em>Reynolds<\/em> doctrine \u2013 that the Free Exercise Clause protects religious belief. That case, <a title=\"U.S. v. Ballard\" href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?navby=case&amp;court=us&amp;vol=322&amp;invol=78\"><em>U.S. v. Ballard<\/em><\/a> (1944), centered on the conviction for mail fraud of Guy Ballard, a faith healer who claimed to possess supernatural healing powers. In <em>Ballard<\/em>, the high court ruled that the state cannot question the truth or validity of someone\u2019s religious beliefs \u2013 in this case, the state could not pass judgment on Ballard\u2019s belief that God grants certain people, including himself, special powers of healing. The court went on to say, however, that the government is free to examine whether someone holds such beliefs sincerely. As a result, the court upheld Ballard\u2019s conviction and ruled that the judge in his case had correctly charged the jury in his fraud trial with deciding whether Ballard\u2019s religious claims were made sincerely and in good faith.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00a0<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"small wp-block-paragraph\">Photo credit: Oswald Eckstein\/Corbis<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Cantwell Decision and the Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses Cases The most important of these pre-Warren rulings was handed down in Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940). In this decision, the court held that the Free Exercise Clause applied to the states on the grounds that religious freedom is part of the 14th Amendment\u2019s Due Process Clause, which protects [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":294,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sub_headline":"","sub_title":"","_prc_public_revisions":[],"_ppp_expiration_hours":0,"_ppp_enabled":false,"ai_generated_summary":"","relatedPosts":[],"reportMaterials":[],"multiSectionReport":[],"package_parts__enabled":false,"package_parts":[],"_prc_fork_parent":0,"_prc_fork_status":"","_prc_active_fork":0,"datacite_doi":"","datacite_doi_citation":"","_prc_seo_qr_attachment_id":0,"spoken_article_player_enabled":true,"displayBylines":false,"footnotes":"","prc_watchers":[]},"categories":[],"tags":[],"bylines":[],"collection":[],"datasets":[],"level_of_effort":[],"primary_audience":[],"information_type":[],"_post_visibility":[],"formats":[464],"_fund_pool":[],"languages":[],"regions-countries":[],"research-teams":[517],"workflow-status":[],"class_list":["post-74601","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","formats-fact-sheet","research-teams-religion"],"label":false,"post_parent":74575,"word_count":654,"canonical_url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance3\/","art_direction":{"A1":{"id":92372,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2012\/07\/delicate-balance_large1-jpg.webp","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2012\/07\/delicate-balance_large1-jpg.webp?w=300&h=200&crop=1","width":300,"height":200,"chartArt":false},"A2":{"id":92372,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2012\/07\/delicate-balance_large1-jpg.webp","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2012\/07\/delicate-balance_large1-jpg.webp?w=268&h=151&crop=1","width":268,"height":151,"chartArt":false},"A3":{"id":92372,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2012\/07\/delicate-balance_large1-jpg.webp","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2012\/07\/delicate-balance_large1-jpg.webp?w=194&h=110&crop=1","width":194,"height":110,"chartArt":false},"A4":{"id":92372,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2012\/07\/delicate-balance_large1-jpg.webp","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2012\/07\/delicate-balance_large1-jpg.webp?w=268&h=151&crop=1","width":268,"height":151,"chartArt":false},"XL":{"id":92372,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2012\/07\/delicate-balance_large1-jpg.webp","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2012\/07\/delicate-balance_large1-jpg.webp?w=300&h=200&crop=1","width":300,"height":200,"chartArt":false},"social":{"id":92372,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2012\/07\/delicate-balance_large1-jpg.webp","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2012\/07\/delicate-balance_large1-jpg.webp?w=300&h=200&crop=1","width":300,"height":200,"chartArt":false}},"_embeds":[],"watchers":[],"table_of_contents":[{"id":74575,"title":"A Delicate Balance: The Free Exercise Clause and the Supreme Court","slug":"a-delicate-balance-the-free-exercise-clause-and-the-supreme-court","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance-the-free-exercise-clause-and-the-supreme-court\/","is_active":false},{"id":74589,"title":"Limitations on Free Exercise Rights","slug":"a-delicate-balance2","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance2\/","is_active":false},{"id":74601,"title":"Glimmers of Change","slug":"a-delicate-balance3","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance3\/","is_active":true},{"id":74609,"title":"Warren Court","slug":"a-delicate-balance4","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance4\/","is_active":false},{"id":74617,"title":"Burger Court","slug":"a-delicate-balance5","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance5\/","is_active":false},{"id":74627,"title":"The <em>Smith<\/em> Decision","slug":"a-delicate-balance6","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance6\/","is_active":false},{"id":74636,"title":"The <em>City of Hialeah<\/em> and <em>Locke<\/em> Decisions","slug":"a-delicate-balance7","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance7\/","is_active":false},{"id":74644,"title":"State Court and Legislative Responses to the <em>Smith<\/em> Decision","slug":"a-delicate-balance8","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance8\/","is_active":false},{"id":74652,"title":"Looking Ahead","slug":"a-delicate-balance9","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance9\/","is_active":false},{"id":74660,"title":"Significant Supreme Court Rulings","slug":"a-delicate-balance10","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance10\/","is_active":false}],"report_materials":[{"key":"aee7ce3f-04fc-4103-a989-6a07d755e040","type":"report","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2007\/10\/free-exercise-1.pdf","label":"","icon":"","attachmentId":""}],"report_pagination":{"current_post":{"id":74601,"title":"Glimmers of Change","slug":"a-delicate-balance3","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance3\/","is_active":true,"page_num":3},"next_post":{"id":74609,"title":"Warren Court","slug":"a-delicate-balance4","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance4\/","is_active":false,"page_num":4},"previous_post":{"id":74589,"title":"Limitations on Free Exercise Rights","slug":"a-delicate-balance2","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance2\/","is_active":false,"page_num":2},"pagination_items":[{"id":74575,"title":"A Delicate Balance: The Free Exercise Clause and the Supreme Court","slug":"a-delicate-balance-the-free-exercise-clause-and-the-supreme-court","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance-the-free-exercise-clause-and-the-supreme-court\/","is_active":false,"page_num":1},{"id":74589,"title":"Limitations on Free Exercise Rights","slug":"a-delicate-balance2","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance2\/","is_active":false,"page_num":2},{"id":74601,"title":"Glimmers of Change","slug":"a-delicate-balance3","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance3\/","is_active":true,"page_num":3},{"id":74609,"title":"Warren Court","slug":"a-delicate-balance4","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance4\/","is_active":false,"page_num":4},{"id":74617,"title":"Burger Court","slug":"a-delicate-balance5","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance5\/","is_active":false,"page_num":5},{"id":74627,"title":"The <em>Smith<\/em> Decision","slug":"a-delicate-balance6","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance6\/","is_active":false,"page_num":6},{"id":74636,"title":"The <em>City of Hialeah<\/em> and <em>Locke<\/em> Decisions","slug":"a-delicate-balance7","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance7\/","is_active":false,"page_num":7},{"id":74644,"title":"State Court and Legislative Responses to the <em>Smith<\/em> Decision","slug":"a-delicate-balance8","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance8\/","is_active":false,"page_num":8},{"id":74652,"title":"Looking Ahead","slug":"a-delicate-balance9","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance9\/","is_active":false,"page_num":9},{"id":74660,"title":"Significant Supreme Court Rulings","slug":"a-delicate-balance10","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/religion\/2007\/10\/24\/a-delicate-balance10\/","is_active":false,"page_num":10}]},"parent_info":{"parent_title":"A Delicate Balance: The Free Exercise Clause and the Supreme Court","parent_id":74575},"materialsOrdered":[],"chaptersOrdered":[],"partsOrdered":[],"partsEnabled":false,"datacite_doi":"","prc_seo_data":{"title":"Glimmers of Change","description":"The Cantwell Decision and the Jehovah's Witnesses Cases The most important of these pre-Warren rulings was handed down in Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940). In this decision, the court held that&hellip;","og_title":"Glimmers of Change","og_description":"","schema_type":"Article","noindex":false,"canonical_url":"","primary_terms":[],"custom_schema":[],"og_image":92372,"indexnow_submitted_at":null,"gsc_index_status":null},"prepublish_checks":{"prc-image-alt-text":{"status":"complete","message":"No image blocks in content.","data":null},"prc-about-this-research":{"status":"incomplete","message":"Add an \"About this research\" details block.","data":null},"prc-paragraph-count":{"status":"complete","message":"Found 7 paragraphs.","data":{"count":7}},"prc-internal-link":{"status":"incomplete","message":"Add at least one internal link.","data":{"count":0}}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"relatedPostsOrdered":[],"bylinesOrdered":[{"key":"ee811f25-9000-42df-b2c4-4492ae12a8fb","termId":2197}],"acknowledgementsOrdered":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74601","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/294"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74601"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74601\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":133173,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74601\/revisions\/133173"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74601"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74601"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74601"},{"taxonomy":"bylines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/bylines?post=74601"},{"taxonomy":"collection","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collection?post=74601"},{"taxonomy":"datasets","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/datasets?post=74601"},{"taxonomy":"level_of_effort","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/level_of_effort?post=74601"},{"taxonomy":"primary_audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/primary_audience?post=74601"},{"taxonomy":"information_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/information_type?post=74601"},{"taxonomy":"_post_visibility","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_post_visibility?post=74601"},{"taxonomy":"formats","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/formats?post=74601"},{"taxonomy":"_fund_pool","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_fund_pool?post=74601"},{"taxonomy":"languages","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/languages?post=74601"},{"taxonomy":"regions-countries","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/regions-countries?post=74601"},{"taxonomy":"research-teams","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/research-teams?post=74601"},{"taxonomy":"workflow-status","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/workflow-status?post=74601"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}