{"id":48327,"date":"2016-06-22T11:56:32","date_gmt":"2016-06-22T16:56:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/2016\/06\/22\/partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016\/"},"modified":"2024-10-28T09:15:59","modified_gmt":"2024-10-28T13:15:59","slug":"partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016\/","title":{"rendered":"Partisanship and Political Animosity in 2016"},"content":{"rendered":"

The 2016 campaign is unfolding against a backdrop of intense partisan division and animosity. Partisans\u2019 views of the opposing party are now more negative than at any point in nearly a quarter of a century.<\/p>\n\n

For the first time in surveys dating to 1992, majorities in both parties express not just unfavorable but very<\/em> unfavorable views of the other party. And today, sizable shares of both Democrats and Republicans say the other party stirs feelings of not just frustration, but fear and anger.<\/p>\n\n

More than half of Democrats (55%) say the Republican Party makes them \u201cafraid,\u201d while 49% of Republicans say the same about the Democratic Party. Among those highly engaged in politics \u2013 those who say they vote regularly and either volunteer for or donate to campaigns \u2013 fully 70% of Democrats and 62% of Republicans say they are afraid of the other party.<\/p>\n\n

\"Frustration,<\/figure>\n\n

Across a number of realms, negative feelings about the opposing party are as powerful \u2013 and in many cases more powerful \u2013 as are positive feelings about one\u2019s own party. While partisans generally agree with their party\u2019s policy positions at least most of the time, just 16% of Republicans and 20% of Democrats say they \u201calmost always\u201d agree with their party\u2019s policy stances. By contrast, more than twice as many Republicans and Democrats (44% each) say they \u201calmost never\u201d agree with the other party\u2019s positions.<\/p>\n\n

These sentiments are not just limited to views of the parties and their policy proposals; they have a personal element as well. Asked to rate several groups on a 0-100 \u201cthermometer\u201d \u2013 where 0 is the coldest, most negative rating and 100 represents the warmest, most positive rating \u2013 Republicans and Democrats give very low ratings to the people in the opposing party. Democrats give Republicans a mean rating of 31 \u2013 far lower than the average ratings for five other groups on the thermometer, including military personnel and elected officials. Republicans give Democrats a mean rating of 29; only elected officials (30) and atheists (36) are nearly as low.<\/p>\n\n

\"'Cold'<\/figure>\n\n

Yet Democrats\u2019 thermometer ratings of Donald Trump and Republicans\u2019 ratings of Hillary Clinton are lower \u2013 much lower. The average rating for Trump among Democrats is 11 on the 0-100 scale. Fully 82% of Democrats give Trump a \u201cvery cold\u201d rating (less than 25), including about two-thirds (68%) who give him a zero<\/em>, the lowest possible rating. (For an analysis of Trump\u2019s thermometer ratings among Republicans, see \u201cMore \u2018warmth\u2019 for Trump among GOP voters concerned by immigrants, diversity.\u201d<\/a>)<\/p>\n\n

Clinton gets an average rating of 12 among Republicans. Among the 76% of Republicans who give Clinton a very cold rating, 59% rate her at zero.<\/p>\n\n

These are among the principal findings of Pew Research Center\u2019s study of partisanship and political animosity, conducted among 4,385 adults from March 2-28 and April 5-May 2 on the Center\u2019s nationally representative American Trends Panel<\/a>. This report was made possible by The Pew Charitable Trusts, which received support for the survey from The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. The surveys were conducted before Trump and Clinton became their parties\u2019 presumptive presidential nominees.<\/p>\n\n

Viewing people in the other party as \u2018closed-minded,\u2019 \u2018lazy\u2019<\/h3>\n\n

For Democrats, no single critique resonates more than the notion that Republicans are closed-minded. Fully 70% of Democrats say that Republicans are more closed-minded than other Americans. And nearly as many Democrats (67%) say the people in their party are more open-minded than other Americans.<\/p>\n\n

\"What<\/figure>\n\n

Fewer Democrats (42%) say Republicans are more dishonest than other Americans, 35% say they are more immoral and 33% say they are more unintelligent.<\/p>\n\n

Many Republicans, by contrast, think Democrats fall short on several traits. While more than half of Republicans (52%) view Democrats as more closed-minded than other Americans, nearly as many say Democrats are more immoral (47%), lazier (46%) and more dishonest (45%).<\/p>\n\n

Not only do almost half of Republicans say Democrats are lazier than other Americans, most (59%) also say the members of their own party are more hard-working. And about half of Republicans (51%) view Republicans as more moral than other Americans.<\/p>\n\n

Despite these widespread partisan stereotypes, most Democrats and Republicans stop short of saying that it would be more difficult to get along with a new community member who belonged to the other party. About three-in-ten Democrats (31%) and 27% of Republicans say it would be harder to get along with a new person in their community if they belonged to the other party.<\/p>\n\n

\"Most<\/figure>\n\n

On the other hand, somewhat greater shares of Democrats (42%) and Republicans (43%) say it would be easier<\/em> to get along with a new neighbor who belongs to their own party.<\/p>\n\n

While the current partisan environment does not for the most part appear to be turning neighbor against neighbor, it may be making for some difficult conversations about politics.<\/p>\n\n

Both Republicans and Democrats are about as likely to say that talking about politics with people whom they disagree with is \u201cstressful and frustrating\u201d as say such conversations are \u201cinteresting and informative.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

And majorities in both parties (65% of Republicans, 63% of Democrats) say that when they talk to people on the other side, they usually end up finding they have less in common politically than they thought.<\/p>\n\n

Growing numbers see opposing party as a \u2018threat\u2019<\/h3>\n\n
\"Rising<\/a><\/figure>\n\n

Our study of polarization in 2014 found that a major element of partisan polarization \u201chas been the growing contempt that many Republicans and Democrats have for the opposing party.\u201d Since then, levels of mutual contempt have grown, and \u201cmany\u201d has become \u201cmost,\u201d according to a separate survey of 2,008 adults,<\/a> conducted on landlines and cellphones from April 12-19, 2016.<\/p>\n\n

Today, 58% of Republicans have a very unfavorable impression of the Democratic Party, up from 46% in 2014 and just 32% during the 2008 election year. Among Democrats, highly negative views of the GOP have followed a similar trajectory \u2013 from 37% in 2008 to 43% in 2014 and 55% currently.<\/p>\n\n

To gauge the depth of partisan dislike, the 2014 survey asked those who expressed very unfavorable opinions of the opposing party if they would go so far as to say \u201cthe party\u2019s policies are so misguided that they threaten the nation\u2019s well-being.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

Over the past two years, as the numbers of Republicans and Democrats with very unfavorable views of the opposing party have grown, so too have the shares saying the other party threatens the nation\u2019s well-being: 45% of Republicans now view Democratic policies as a threat, up from 37% in 2014. And 41% of Democrats say the same about the Republican Party\u2019s policies, an increase of 10 percentage points from two years ago.<\/p>\n\n

Negative roots of partisanship \u2013 and partisan leaning<\/h3>\n\n

The power of negative feeling toward the opposition is reflected in the reasons people give for identifying with their own party. Majorities in both parties point to the positive impact of their own party\u2019s policies as a major reason for their choice of parties \u2013 but nearly as many cite the harm caused by the opposing party\u2019s policies.<\/p>\n\n

And independents, who now outnumber both Republicans and Democrats<\/a> and overwhelmingly \u201clean\u201d to one party or the other, are far more likely to cite negative than positive factors for why they form their loose partisan ties.<\/p>\n\n

Among Republicans, 68% say a major reason they identify with the GOP is that \u201cthe Democratic Party\u2019s policies are harmful to the country,\u201d while 64% say it is because they think \u201cthe Republican Party\u2019s policies are good for the country.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

More Democrats cite the positive effects of their party\u2019s policies than the negative consequences of GOP policies, but the margin is modest: 68% say a major reason they are a Democrat is that the Democratic Party\u2019s policies are beneficial for the country, while 62% say a major reason is because Republican policies harm the country.<\/p>\n\n

\"Why<\/figure>\n\n

Other reasons for identifying with a party, such as having a lot in common with its members or having long-standing ties with a party, are cited far less frequently as major factors for choosing to identify with a party.<\/p>\n\n

\"Overview_7i\"<\/figure>\n\n

For independents, by contrast, negative motives are cited most frequently among the reasons for leaning toward a party. Among Republican-leaning independents, 55% say a major reason for leaning toward the GOP is that Democratic policies are harmful to the country. Just 30% cite the positive effects of Republican policies.<\/p>\n\n

For Democratic leaners, far more also point to the negative consequences of the other party\u2019s policies (51%) rather than the positive effects of their own party\u2019s policies (34%) as a reason to associate, however loosely, with their own party.<\/p>\n\n

Other key findings<\/h3>\n\n

Having a friend from the other party matters, especially for Republicans.<\/strong> In both parties, those who have few or no friends in the other party are more likely to have \u201cvery cold\u201d feelings about the people in that party. This is especially the case for Republicans: Those with few or no Democratic friends are twice as likely to rate Democrats very coldly than are Republicans with at least some Democratic friends (62% vs. 30%).<\/p>\n\n

Most Republicans and Democrats want compromise on their terms.<\/strong> Majorities of Democrats (62%) and Republicans (58%) say their party should get more of what it wants on the key issues facing the nation. Partisans with colder feelings toward the other party are even more likely to say their own side should get more of what it wants.<\/p>\n\n

\"Most<\/figure>\n\n

Four-in-ten Republicans give Michelle Obama a zero<\/em>.<\/strong> Republicans feel very negatively toward Barack Obama, but a majority also gives \u201cvery cold\u201d thermometer ratings to Michelle Obama. Fully 81% of Republicans feel very coldly toward Barack Obama, including 59% who give him a zero on the 0-100 scale. Nearly six-in-ten Republicans (59%) give very cold ratings to Michelle Obama; 40% of Republicans give her a zero.<\/p>\n\n

Parties and issues.<\/strong> Majorities of Republicans and Democrats say they agree with their parties\u2019 positions on nine issues tested. However, \u201cstrong\u201d agreement varies widely by issue: Republicans are more likely to strongly agree with the GOP\u2019s position on illegal immigration and gun policy, while Democrats are most likely to strongly agree with Democratic positions on health care, abortion and climate change.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The 2016 campaign is unfolding against a backdrop of intense partisan division and animosity. Partisans\u2019 views of the opposing party are now more negative than at any point in nearly a quarter of a century.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":386,"featured_media":63735,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sub_headline":"Highly negative views of the opposing party \u2013 and its members","sub_title":"Highly negative views of the opposing party \u2013 and its members","_prc_public_revisions":[],"_ppp_expiration_hours":0,"_ppp_enabled":false,"ai_generated_summary":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"apple_news_api_id":"","apple_news_api_revision":"","apple_news_api_created_at":"","apple_news_api_modified_at":"","apple_news_api_share_url":"","apple_news_api_pending":"","apple_news_is_preview":false,"apple_news_is_hidden":false,"relatedPosts":[],"reportMaterials":[{"key":"8485e7c3-0d6c-4ce4-aeb2-d1d0a45cef75","type":"report","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2016\/06\/06-22-16-Partisanship-and-animosity-release.pdf"},{"key":"6d878e3b-b8bb-46ca-8abb-c8fed87bf920","type":"topline","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2016\/06\/06-22-16-Partisanship-and-animosity-topline-for-release.pdf"}],"multiSectionReport":[{"key":"_migrate_0","postId":48319},{"key":"_migrate_1","postId":48308},{"key":"_migrate_2","postId":48299},{"key":"_migrate_3","postId":48288},{"key":"_migrate_4","postId":48278},{"key":"_migrate_5","postId":48266},{"key":"_migrate_6","postId":48258},{"key":"_migrate_7","postId":48250},{"key":"_migrate_8","postId":48240}],"package_parts__enabled":false,"package_parts":[],"datacite_doi":"","datacite_doi_citation":"","_prc_seo_qr_attachment_id":0,"spoken_article_player_enabled":true,"displayBylines":true,"footnotes":"","prc_watchers":[],"_prc_fork_parent":0,"_prc_fork_status":"","_prc_active_fork":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[42,87,56,418],"tags":[],"bylines":[],"collection":[],"datasets":[1183],"level_of_effort":[],"primary_audience":[],"information_type":[],"_post_visibility":[],"formats":[458],"_fund_pool":[],"languages":[],"regions-countries":[],"research-teams":[520],"workflow-status":[],"class_list":["post-48327","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-election-2016","category-political-animosity","category-political-discourse","category-political-polarization","datasets-american-trends-panel-wave-16","formats-report","research-teams-politics"],"label":false,"post_parent":0,"word_count":1615,"canonical_url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016\/","art_direction":{"A1":{"id":63735,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2016\/06\/PP_16.05.17_partisanAntipathy_featured.png","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2016\/06\/PP_16.05.17_partisanAntipathy_featured.png?w=564&h=317&crop=1","width":564,"height":317,"chartArt":false},"A2":{"id":63735,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2016\/06\/PP_16.05.17_partisanAntipathy_featured.png","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2016\/06\/PP_16.05.17_partisanAntipathy_featured.png?w=268&h=151&crop=1","width":268,"height":151,"chartArt":false},"A3":{"id":63735,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2016\/06\/PP_16.05.17_partisanAntipathy_featured.png","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2016\/06\/PP_16.05.17_partisanAntipathy_featured.png?w=194&h=110&crop=1","width":194,"height":110,"chartArt":false},"A4":{"id":63735,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2016\/06\/PP_16.05.17_partisanAntipathy_featured.png","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2016\/06\/PP_16.05.17_partisanAntipathy_featured.png?w=268&h=151&crop=1","width":268,"height":151,"chartArt":false},"XL":{"id":63735,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2016\/06\/PP_16.05.17_partisanAntipathy_featured.png","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2016\/06\/PP_16.05.17_partisanAntipathy_featured.png?w=640&h=320&crop=1","width":640,"height":320,"chartArt":false},"social":{"id":63735,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2016\/06\/PP_16.05.17_partisanAntipathy_featured.png","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2016\/06\/PP_16.05.17_partisanAntipathy_featured.png?w=640&h=320&crop=1","width":640,"height":320,"chartArt":false}},"_embeds":[],"watchers":[],"table_of_contents":[{"id":48327,"title":"Partisanship and Political Animosity in 2016","slug":"partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016\/","is_active":true},{"id":48319,"title":"1. Feelings about partisans and the parties","slug":"1-feelings-about-partisans-and-the-parties","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/1-feelings-about-partisans-and-the-parties\/","is_active":false},{"id":48308,"title":"2. The roots of partisanship","slug":"2-the-roots-of-partisanship","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/2-the-roots-of-partisanship\/","is_active":false},{"id":48299,"title":"3. Partisan environments, views of political conversations and disagreements","slug":"3-partisan-environments-views-of-political-conversations-and-disagreements","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/3-partisan-environments-views-of-political-conversations-and-disagreements\/","is_active":false},{"id":48288,"title":"4. Partisan stereotypes, views of Republicans and Democrats as neighbors","slug":"4-partisan-stereotypes-views-of-republicans-and-democrats-as-neighbors","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/4-partisan-stereotypes-views-of-republicans-and-democrats-as-neighbors\/","is_active":false},{"id":48278,"title":"5. Views of parties\u2019 positions on issues, ideologies","slug":"5-views-of-parties-positions-on-issues-ideologies","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/5-views-of-parties-positions-on-issues-ideologies\/","is_active":false},{"id":48266,"title":"6. How do the political parties make you feel?","slug":"6-how-do-the-political-parties-make-you-feel","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/6-how-do-the-political-parties-make-you-feel\/","is_active":false},{"id":48258,"title":"7. Partisan views of 2016 candidates, Barack and Michelle Obama, views of the election","slug":"7-partisan-views-of-2016-candidates-barack-and-michelle-obama-views-of-the-election","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/7-partisan-views-of-2016-candidates-barack-and-michelle-obama-views-of-the-election\/","is_active":false},{"id":48250,"title":"Methodology","slug":"methodology-73","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/methodology-73\/","is_active":false},{"id":48240,"title":"Appendix A: Measures and scales","slug":"appendix-a-measures-and-scales","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/appendix-a-measures-and-scales\/","is_active":false}],"report_materials":[{"key":"8485e7c3-0d6c-4ce4-aeb2-d1d0a45cef75","type":"report","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2016\/06\/06-22-16-Partisanship-and-animosity-release.pdf","label":"","icon":"","attachmentId":""},{"key":"6d878e3b-b8bb-46ca-8abb-c8fed87bf920","type":"topline","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2016\/06\/06-22-16-Partisanship-and-animosity-topline-for-release.pdf","label":"","icon":"","attachmentId":""},{"type":"dataset","id":1183,"label":"American Trends Panel Wave 16","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/dataset\/american-trends-panel-wave-16\/"}],"report_pagination":{"current_post":{"id":48327,"title":"Partisanship and Political Animosity in 2016","slug":"partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016\/","is_active":true,"page_num":1},"next_post":{"id":48319,"title":"1. Feelings about partisans and the parties","slug":"1-feelings-about-partisans-and-the-parties","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/1-feelings-about-partisans-and-the-parties\/","is_active":false,"page_num":2},"previous_post":null,"pagination_items":[{"id":48327,"title":"Partisanship and Political Animosity in 2016","slug":"partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016\/","is_active":true,"page_num":1},{"id":48319,"title":"1. Feelings about partisans and the parties","slug":"1-feelings-about-partisans-and-the-parties","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/1-feelings-about-partisans-and-the-parties\/","is_active":false,"page_num":2},{"id":48308,"title":"2. The roots of partisanship","slug":"2-the-roots-of-partisanship","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/2-the-roots-of-partisanship\/","is_active":false,"page_num":3},{"id":48299,"title":"3. Partisan environments, views of political conversations and disagreements","slug":"3-partisan-environments-views-of-political-conversations-and-disagreements","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/3-partisan-environments-views-of-political-conversations-and-disagreements\/","is_active":false,"page_num":4},{"id":48288,"title":"4. Partisan stereotypes, views of Republicans and Democrats as neighbors","slug":"4-partisan-stereotypes-views-of-republicans-and-democrats-as-neighbors","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/4-partisan-stereotypes-views-of-republicans-and-democrats-as-neighbors\/","is_active":false,"page_num":5},{"id":48278,"title":"5. Views of parties\u2019 positions on issues, ideologies","slug":"5-views-of-parties-positions-on-issues-ideologies","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/5-views-of-parties-positions-on-issues-ideologies\/","is_active":false,"page_num":6},{"id":48266,"title":"6. How do the political parties make you feel?","slug":"6-how-do-the-political-parties-make-you-feel","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/6-how-do-the-political-parties-make-you-feel\/","is_active":false,"page_num":7},{"id":48258,"title":"7. Partisan views of 2016 candidates, Barack and Michelle Obama, views of the election","slug":"7-partisan-views-of-2016-candidates-barack-and-michelle-obama-views-of-the-election","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/7-partisan-views-of-2016-candidates-barack-and-michelle-obama-views-of-the-election\/","is_active":false,"page_num":8},{"id":48250,"title":"Methodology","slug":"methodology-73","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/methodology-73\/","is_active":false,"page_num":9},{"id":48240,"title":"Appendix A: Measures and scales","slug":"appendix-a-measures-and-scales","link":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2016\/06\/22\/appendix-a-measures-and-scales\/","is_active":false,"page_num":10}]},"parent_info":{"parent_title":"Partisanship and Political Animosity in 2016","parent_id":48327},"materialsOrdered":[{"key":"8485e7c3-0d6c-4ce4-aeb2-d1d0a45cef75","type":"report","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2016\/06\/06-22-16-Partisanship-and-animosity-release.pdf","label":"","attachmentId":0,"icon":""},{"key":"6d878e3b-b8bb-46ca-8abb-c8fed87bf920","type":"topline","url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2016\/06\/06-22-16-Partisanship-and-animosity-topline-for-release.pdf","label":"","attachmentId":0,"icon":""}],"chaptersOrdered":[{"key":"_migrate_0","postId":48319},{"key":"_migrate_1","postId":48308},{"key":"_migrate_2","postId":48299},{"key":"_migrate_3","postId":48288},{"key":"_migrate_4","postId":48278},{"key":"_migrate_5","postId":48266},{"key":"_migrate_6","postId":48258},{"key":"_migrate_7","postId":48250},{"key":"_migrate_8","postId":48240}],"partsOrdered":[],"partsEnabled":false,"datacite_doi":"","prc_seo_data":{"title":"Partisanship and Political Animosity in 2016","description":"The 2016 campaign is unfolding against a backdrop of intense partisan division and animosity. Partisans\u2019 views of the opposing party are now more negative than at any point in nearly a quarter of a century.","og_title":"Partisanship and Political Animosity in 2016","og_description":"The 2016 campaign is unfolding against a backdrop of intense partisan division and animosity. Partisans\u2019 views of the opposing party are now more negative than at any point in nearly a quarter of a century.","schema_type":"Article","noindex":false,"canonical_url":"","primary_terms":{"category":87},"custom_schema":[],"og_image":63735,"indexnow_submitted_at":null,"gsc_index_status":null},"prepublish_checks":{"prc-image-alt-text":{"status":"complete","message":"All images have alt text.","data":null},"prc-about-this-research":{"status":"incomplete","message":"Add an \"About this research\" details block.","data":null},"prc-paragraph-count":{"status":"complete","message":"Found 32 paragraphs.","data":{"count":32}},"prc-internal-link":{"status":"complete","message":"Found 5 internal links.","data":{"count":5}}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2016\/06\/PP_16.05.17_partisanAntipathy_featured.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"relatedPostsOrdered":[],"bylinesOrdered":[],"acknowledgementsOrdered":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48327","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/386"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48327"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48327\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":190271,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48327\/revisions\/190271"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/63735"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48327"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48327"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48327"},{"taxonomy":"bylines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/bylines?post=48327"},{"taxonomy":"collection","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collection?post=48327"},{"taxonomy":"datasets","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/datasets?post=48327"},{"taxonomy":"level_of_effort","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/level_of_effort?post=48327"},{"taxonomy":"primary_audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/primary_audience?post=48327"},{"taxonomy":"information_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/information_type?post=48327"},{"taxonomy":"_post_visibility","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_post_visibility?post=48327"},{"taxonomy":"formats","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/formats?post=48327"},{"taxonomy":"_fund_pool","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_fund_pool?post=48327"},{"taxonomy":"languages","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/languages?post=48327"},{"taxonomy":"regions-countries","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/regions-countries?post=48327"},{"taxonomy":"research-teams","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/research-teams?post=48327"},{"taxonomy":"workflow-status","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpha.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/workflow-status?post=48327"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}