Pew Research Center

FOR RELEASE SEPTEMBER 7, 2011

Irene Aftermath Top Story for Public, Media

61% Hearing Mostly Bad News About Economy

FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

Communications Department
202.419.4372
www.pewresearch.org

RECOMMENDED CITATION

Pew Research Center, September 2011, "Irene Aftermath Top Story for Public, Media"

About Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan, nonadvocacy fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It does not take policy positions. The Center conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, computational social science research and other data-driven research. It studies politics and policy; news habits and media; the internet and technology; religion; race and ethnicity; international affairs; social, demographic and economic trends; science; research methodology and data science; and immigration and migration. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder.

© Pew Research Center 2026

Table of contents

  • About Pew Research Center
  • Irene Aftermath Top Story for Public, Media
  • About the News Interest Index

Irene Aftermath Top Story for Public, Media

61% Hearing Mostly Bad News About Economy

Overview

The aftermath of Hurricane Irene was the top story for the public and the media last week, as flooding worsened in many East Coast states well after the storm winds had died down.

More than a third of the public (36%) say that the impact of the hurricane was the news they followed most closely. Another 23% say news about the struggling economy was their top story, according to the latest News Interest Index survey, conducted Sept. 1-4 among 1,001 adults by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press.

News about Irene accounted for 20% of the coverage analyzed by the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism (PEJ), making Irene the most covered story of the week. News about the economy was not far behind, making up 16% of coverage.

Not surprisingly, those same two stories were the top topics of conversations. When people are asked which news topics they have been talking about with friends, one-in-four (25%) mention an economic issue – such as the job situation or the stock market, while 22% say they have been talking about Irene. No other story comes close:  5% each say they talked about the East Coast earthquake or the 2012 elections, 3% each say the conflict in Libya or sports stories and 2% name weather or the federal deficit or national debt.

Those living in the Northeast are much more likely to mention Hurricane Irene than the economy (38% vs. 20%), while those in the West are far more likely to have been talking about the economy than about the hurricane (38% vs. 9%).

Economic News Seen as Mostly Negative

As President Obama prepares to speak to the nation Thursday night about steps to boost job creation, six-in-ten (61%) say they are hearing mostly bad news about the economy. That’s down from 67% at the start of August, but still near the high levels recorded in early 2009 near the height of the economic crisis.

Perceptions of the tone of economic news worsened dramatically through much of 2011 as evidence mounted that the recovery had stalled. In May, about a third (35%) said they were hearing mostly bad news about the economy.

That grew to 49% in July and then hit a high for the year so far in August. The numbers moved little between August and September, though in a slightly more positive direction. The number hearing a mix of good and bad news rose from 30% in August to 35%. Still, that is about half the percentage that said this in January (68%). Just 2% say they are hearing mostly good news about the economy.

Perceptions among partisans are little changed from last month. Currently, 66% of Republicans, 58% of Democrats and 65% of independents say they are hearing mostly bad news about the economy. Three-in-ten Republicans (30%) say they are hearing a mix of news, comparable to the 37% of Democrats and 34% of independents that say the same.

Those following economic news very closely are about as likely as those following less closely to say they are hearing mostly bad economic news (65% and 58%, respectively).

The Week’s News

About four-in-ten (39%) say they followed news about Hurricane Irene very closely last week. Women followed this story more closely than men (44% very closely vs. 34%).  Not surprisingly, those in Northeast followed the hurricane’s aftermath more attentively (55% very closely) than those in the South (41%), Midwest (32%) or the West (31%).  The prior week, which included preparations for the hurricane and the day it made landfall in North Carolina, 45% of the public said they followed news about Irene very closely.

More than four-in-ten (44%) say they followed news about the economy very closely last week, maintaining the high level of interest in recent weeks as economic troubles have deepened both in the U.S. and in Europe. News about the economy accounted for 16% of coverage measured by PEJ. That includes the partisan skirmish in Washington over the scheduling of Obama’s speech.

About two-in-ten (22%) say they followed news about the 2012 elections very closely, a level consistent with interest in recent weeks. Nearly one-in-ten (9%) say this was the story they followed most closely. News about the candidates for president in 2012 made up 7% of coverage. About a third of Republicans (32%) say they followed news about the candidates very closely, much higher than the 19% Democrats or independents that say the same.

The public expressed similar levels of interest in developments in Afghanistan and Libya. Fewer than two-in-ten (17%) say they followed news about either war zone very closely; 7% say news about Afghanistan was their top story, while 6% say this about Libya.

Interest in news about Libya has remained modest in recent weeks, even with the apparent ouster of Moammar Gadhafi from power. News about Libya made up 8% of coverage, down significantly from the week before when rebel forces took Tripoli and sent Gadhafi on the run. One week earlier, news about Libya topped coverage, making up 25% of the newshole.

As the long-running war in Afghanistan continues, the public generally maintains a modest level of interest that spikes with major developments. For example, in mid-August about four-in-ten (39%) very closely followed news about the crash of a military helicopter that killed 30 Americans. That week, the Afghanistan crash was the public’s top story (27% most closely).

Few closely followed news about the U.S. Justice Department moving to block the merger of AT&T and T-Mobile: 8% followed this news very closely, while 2% say this was their top story. The news accounted for 1% of coverage.

These findings are based on the most recent installment of the weekly News Interest Index, an ongoing project of the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. The index, building on the Center’s longstanding research into public attentiveness to major news stories, examines news interest as it relates to the news media’s coverage. The weekly survey is conducted in conjunction with The Project for Excellence in Journalism’s News Coverage Index, which monitors the news reported by major newspaper, television, radio and online news outlets on an ongoing basis. In the most recent week, data relating to news coverage were collected Aug. 29-Sept. 4, and survey data measuring public interest in the top news stories of the week were collected Sept. 1-4 from a nationally representative sample of 1,001 adults.

About the News Interest Index

The News Interest Index is a weekly survey conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press aimed at gauging the public’s interest in and reaction to major news events. This project has been undertaken in conjunction with the Project for Excellence in Journalism’s News Coverage Index, an ongoing content analysis of the news.  The News Coverage Index catalogues the news from top news organizations across five major sectors of the media: newspapers, network television, cable television, radio and the internet.  Each week (from Monday through Sunday) PEJ compiles this data to identify the top stories for the week.  (For more information about the Project for Excellence in Journalism’s News Coverage Index, go to www.pewresearch.org/pewresearch-org/journalism.) The News Interest Index survey collects data from Thursday through Sunday to gauge public interest in the most covered stories of the week.

Results for this survey are based on telephone interviews conducted Sept. 1-4, 2011, among a national sample of 1,001 adults 18 years of age or older living in the continental United States (601 respondents were interviewed on a landline telephone, and 400 were interviewed on a cell phone, including 192 who had no landline telephone). The survey was conducted by interviewers at Princeton Data Source under the direction of Princeton Survey Research Associates International. A combination of landline and cell phone random digit dial samples were used; both samples were provided by Survey Sampling International. Interviews were conducted in English. Respondents in the landline sample were selected by randomly asking for the youngest adult male or female who is now at home. Interviews in the cell sample were conducted with the person who answered the phone, if that person was an adult 18 years of age or older.

The combined landline and cell phone sample are weighted using an iterative technique that matches gender, age, education, race, Hispanic origin, region, and population density to parameters from the March 2010 Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey. The sample is also weighted to match current patterns of telephone status based on extrapolations from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. The weighting procedure also accounts for the fact that respondents with both landline and cell phones have a greater probability of being included in the combined sample and adjusts for household size within the landline sample. Sampling errors and statistical tests of significance take into account the effect of weighting. The following table shows the sample sizes and the error attributable to sampling that would be expected at the 95% level of confidence for different groups in the survey:

Sample sizes and sampling errors for other subgroups are available upon request.

In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.