Pew Research Center

FOR RELEASE FEBRUARY 1, 2008

A Look at the Numbers

So far, the 2008 primaries and caucuses have been anything but predictable -- comebacks, fallbacks, not to mention surprised pollsters. But a closer look reveals some common themes that have emerged.

BY Tom Rosentiel

FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

Communications Department
202.419.4372
www.pewresearch.org

RECOMMENDED CITATION

Pew Research Center, February 2008, "A Look at the Numbers"

About Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan, nonadvocacy fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It does not take policy positions. The Center conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, computational social science research and other data-driven research. It studies politics and policy; news habits and media; the internet and technology; religion; race and ethnicity; international affairs; social, demographic and economic trends; science; research methodology and data science; and immigration and migration. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder.

© Pew Research Center 2026

Table of contents

  • About Pew Research Center

A Look at the Numbers

So far, the 2008 primaries and caucuses have been anything but predictable -- comebacks, fallbacks, not to mention surprised pollsters. But a closer look reveals some common themes that have emerged.

by Andrew Kohut, President, Pew Research Center Special to the New York Times

So far, the 2008 primaries and caucuses have been anything but predictable — comebacks, fallbacks, not to mention surprised pollsters. But a closer look reveals some common themes that have emerged, despite a still-forming consensus about nominees.

Figure

First, this election matters to voters, particularly to Democrats and young people. Democrats turned out at higher rates in Iowa and New Hampshire than in 2000 and in greater numbers in South Carolina than in 2004. Young voters made up a larger share of the Iowa and New Hampshire Democratic electorates than they have in previous primaries. However in South Carolina, the turnout by African-Americans overshadowed all else.

Republican turnout has lagged Democratic turnout, notably in New Hampshire. Compared with previous recent elections, the G.O.P. participation was higher in Iowa this year than in 2000, but markedly lower in Michigan and in South Carolina.

Independent voters have played a significant role in the early contests and have consistently favored Barack Obama…

Independents have also been big backers of John McCain, helping him secure his victories in Florida, New Hampshire and South Carolina.

[Race and gender have been big factors among Democrats, but issues have not.]

Read the full commentary at nytimes.com